Poster's note : this is interesting mainly as an example of the quality of
coverage of the conference in the general media. The CDR lasers idea
described I felt was completely outlandish, and didn't pass even vague
scrutiny. I'm somewhat disappointed that the media coverage appeared
restricted to inaccurate reports or placing undue weight on really fringe
content.

http://motherboard.vice.com/read/scientists-propose-using-lasers-to-fight-global-warming-from-space

Scientists Propose Using Lasers to Fight Global Warming From Space

Written by BRIAN MERCHANT

August 22, 2014 // 06:00 AM EST

At the world's first major geoengineering conference,
two separate scientists put forward proposals to use lasers to modify the
Earth's climate and fight global warming, from space.

One suggested that a satellite equipped with a high-powered laser could
grow clouds in the atmosphere below; the other proposed lasers that would
blast greenhouse gases from orbit to effectively erase the agents of
climate change.

The highly theoretical proposals are still in their early stages, and
easily count as the more radically ambitious of the already radically
ambitious climate engineering schemes discussed by scientists. These plans
don't concern gadgets that absorb carbon pollution or spreading particles
in the sky, after all—we're talking about space lasers powerful enough to
alter the climate.

And European Space Agency fellow Isabelle Dicaire studies them full time.
She traveled to Berlin this week to discuss how a satellite equipped with
high-powered LIDAR lasers may prove useful for researching—and maybe
eventually actually orchestrating—climate engineering.

LIDAR is remote sensing technology that blasts a laser at a target, then
analyzes its reflection to accurately measure distances. It's already
widely used here on Earth (on things such as Google's driverless car), and
by NASA's CALIPSO satellite. Dicaire is interested in what we could do with
a much more powerful LIDAR positioned in space; theoretically, it should be
able to better detect the movement of particles in clouds, and maybe even
make new ones.

THIS WOULD BE THE FIRST STEP IF YOU'D LIKE TO DO LASER CLOUD SEEDINGAmong
the most widely discussed geoengineering ideas of recent years is so-called
cloud-brightening. A cloud is just a mass of water vapor that's condensed
into droplets around particles floating in the air—and the more droplets in
a cloud, the more sunlight gets bounced off of them.

So, geoengineers figure that if you can increase the surface area of
clouds, or seed more of them altogether, you could begin to reflect back
enough sunlight to cool the globe. Research into the subject has been
limited, and Dicaire says a powerful LIDAR would help scientists better
understand the science. Beyond that, it could be used to carry out the
cloud-seeding itself.

"Another application is to use the effects that are happening inside the
plasma filaments to do some exotic stuff. For instance, laser-based cloud
seeding," she said. Researchers at the University of Geneva, Dicaire says,
have demonstrated that lasers can produce droplets.

"They are generating nano-sized water droplets from the laser," she
said. They're doing it in a lab, though. "I'm monitoring the field to see
what we could do from space."

So, theoretically: "You can use the Earth Observation System to target or
find where you have your clouds, what kind of clouds you would like to
seed, and then from that, aim the beam towards these clouds." Bear in mind
that the idea ESA is examining here is entirely theoretical, and no laser
even exists in orbit capable of performing such a feat. But it's not
unthinkable, technologically speaking—the political and economic hurdles
are probably larger.

"So far you can only find these laser sources on the ground. Eventually, if
someone would like to put them in a satellite, they would have to space
qualify them. So this is something that some industries are looking into.
And this would be the first step if you'd like to do laser cloud seeding."

This would likely be a pretty expensive way to make clouds brighter—older
proposals suggest using boats to spray seawater skyward—and you'd need an
awful lot of cloud-growing laser satellites. But Dicaire, for now, is more
interested in the underlying research LIDAR could help scientists perform.

Image: NASA

"It's a very basic concept. The only one looking at it at the moment is
ESA, and it's very preliminary. We just want to see if it's possible to
send your beam from the satellite to the ground. If it's possible then,
yeah, we'll look more closely into this," she said.

Alternatively, we could use another type of laser-toting satellite to blast
away the greenhouse gases already in the atmosphere. That's what Aidan
Cowley, a professor at Dublin City University, proposes, anyhow. He
believes that a solar-powered satellite equipped with a plasma laser could
hone in on heat-trapping gases in order to get them to break apart into
less harmful ones.

"We've already observed here on earth that plasma ionization approaches,
for example, air plasmas, can essentially dissociate long-lived pollutants:
SF6, carbon dioxide. This is something we've observed, and it's been well
reported in literature," Cowley told me. "Plasma essentially will excite
whatever gas it's traveling through, and just by giving energy to these
gases, these molecular species, they'll break up—in the case of SF6,
they'll become S, and become more benign greenhouse gases."

It's an alluring idea, of course; SF6 is a potent and long-lasting
greenhouse gas. And our immense CO2 output is driving climate change toward
a cliff; it'd be convenient if we could just zap them away with a laser. So
why haven't we done it already, if plasma ionization has proven to scatter
the building blocks of our climate crisis?

"The problem about using [lasers] as a means of actually addressing
climate, greenhouse gases per se, is that the energy used to strike those
plasmas has to be generated here on Earth. So essentially you're burning
fuel to destroy the emissions that you're producing anyway, and it ends up
being a net positive to the emissions profile anyway. So you have to come
up with a low cost, energy-free scenario that frees you from that paradigm.
And that's where the idea of using space solar power to do so comes into
it."

A satellite outfitted with high-efficiency solar panels should do the trick.

THERE'S NOTHING CRAZY ABOUT IT, SOLAR POWER IN SPACE"Essentially by using
abundant power that's available in orbit, to drive ionization phenomenon in
the atmosphere, you can neatly size up the problem of doing the same thing
here on the ground, and you have a nearly unlimited supply of energy to do
so. You just need to develop the technology and tap it for that," he said.

Now, there are other pitfalls here; those greenhouse gases are already
pretty diffuse in the atmosphere, so it'd be hard to target them
effectively with a laser. Cowley says you'd probably need multiple units to
do it effectively. Then there's the vast expense of building, testing, and
deploying the machines, of course.

Cowley also says his satellite would be useful for creating ozone, to patch
up the holes we've left by overusing aerosols. "You could use it to create
ozone, too," he said. "Pretty strong pedigree for producing ozone. It's a
very easy trick." Then again, he adds, the technology could be used to the
reverse effect, too.

"Conversely, from a military perspective, you could also use it to destroy
the ozone as well, if you do it the right way," he said. "It could
potentially open the holes in the atmosphere of your not too friendly
neighbors."

So does Dr. Cowley think his greenhouse gas-blasting satellite is feasible?

"I still think it will take a long time. It's got an underground movement
to a certain degree, so I think it will continue to be developed, going
forward. Space solar power has got a fairly good future for certain
applications, and, I think, eventually, like most technology, it will be
the niche that drives the mainstream adaptation," he said. "Find one good
niche and make it work, and people will go, 'oh that's not so crazy after
all.' And there's nothing crazy about it, solar power in space. It's not
science fiction."

TOPICS: planet hacks, geoengineering,climate
change, Earth, science, space,nasa, esa, lasers, carbon
dioxide, carbon,Carbon Emissions, pollution

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to