I greatly appreciate the scope of the concept and the aim of finding a key 
lever in addressing a multitude of issues.

The issues of long term cost and deployment control/monitoring (i.e. 
responsibility)needs to be addressed. In that, open water manipulation of 
the microbial loop can offer up a multitude of surprises and the microbial 
loop is, without exception, the most powerful/far reaching biotic process 
on this planet.

The issue of cost should not be devalued. An example of a costly event 
would be storm disruption of the floating fertilizer 
application/distribution. Winds will cause the flakes to collect in some 
areas yet be absent in other close by territory. Surface waters are highly 
effected by winds (the most dramatic example being the wind driven 'skin 
effect' of the ENSO). In short, the cost of 'maintaining' a coarse of 
treatment in any one target territory would be substantial and perpetual. 

Also, this type of somewhat random/uncontrollable distribution/collection 
may well cause over fertilization in some areas, which can lead to dead 
zones, while the majority of the target territory is void of 'treatment'. 

Further, the trans-boundary conflict potential is high as, once released, 
there is no controlling means/method to prevent high concentrations of 
fertilizer from building up in waters controlled by adverse actors.

In brief, it is important that these types of ideas are explored and 
exposed to the broadest possible 'constructive' critique. One related 
patent you may wish to review is here 
<http://pdfpiw.uspto.gov/.piw?PageNum=0&docid=08535107&IDKey=D7E15CDB611C%0D%0A&HomeUrl=http%3A%2F%2Fpatft.uspto.gov%2Fnetacgi%2Fnph-Parser%3FSect1%3DPTO2%2526p%3D1%2526u%3D%25252Fnetahtml%25252Fsearch-bool.html%2526r%3D2%2526f%3DG%2526l%3D50%2526d%3Dpall%2526s1%3D441%25252F1.CCLS.%2526OS%3DCCL%2F441%2F1%2526RS%3DCCL%2F441%2F1>.
 
The cost factor is somewhat addressed in the patent yet the cost of 
fuel/feed/labor makes the business model excessively weak. As an important 
environmental side note to the fish feed issue within the patent; 50% of 
all wild caught fish are reduced to fish feed which is simply 
unsustainable. And, we are now down to less than 20% of the (1950) original 
wild stocks. Ignoring that one fact/issue significantly weakens any 
mariculture profit reliant option. Growing/cultivating fish feed is the 
only solution for any mariculture based GE option.

Your floating fertilizer flakes corralled within large area floating pens 
(as depicted in the above patent), along with a more sound business model 
than described in the above patent, would begin to bring substance to this 
type of wide area fertilizer/albedo operation. And, as your are collecting 
multiple options along this line of thought, I would like to draw your 
attention to a paper published in 1942. REDUCTION OF CARBON DIOXIDE COUPLED 
WITH THE OXYHYDROGEN REACTION IN ALGAE 
<http://jgp.rupress.org/content/26/2/241.full.pdf+html>. Yes, micro algae 
can be cultivated without light...of any type.   

I hope this is helpful.

Best regards,

Michael Hayes

On Monday, September 1, 2014 10:04:21 PM UTC-7, [email protected] wrote:
>
> Sam Carana has made a good summary of two of my recent concepts that are 
> designed to address both climate change and ocean acidification at 
> http://geo-engineering.blogspot.de/2014/08/seven-ocean-fertilization-strategies.html
>   
> Would members consider how the concepts and their supporting technologies 
> might be: constructively criticised, improved, their effects modelled, be 
> lab tested, and approved for mesocosm piloting. Full documentation is 
> available on request from [email protected] <javascript:>  They are made 
> freely available under Creative Commons (CC BY 4.0) Attribution licensing. 
>   
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to