For the equivalent of doubling the current atmospheric CO2 concentration, you'd 
need ~120 Mt of SF6. That is about 1/4 of the U.S. annual commodity chemical 
production (500 Mt in 2000).

-Josh

________________________________
From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on 
behalf of Andrew Lockley [[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 10:10 AM
To: David Lewis
Cc: geoengineering
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Dr Evil


But to get an equivalent amount of warming with CFCs or similar would actually 
be quite practical, I think. It could potentially be weaponised quite easily. 
It would probably be quite easy to conceal the necessary volumes of SF6 or 
similar, eg in old salt mines.

It would even possibly be within our technology horizon to make a spaceship 
that could crawl slowly to another planet and crash land that kind of volume of 
chemicals into their atmosphere. Basically a crude geoengineering version of 
the death star.

A

On 28 Sep 2014 17:22, "David Lewis" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Goldblatt said in 2013:  "our estimate is that it would take 30,000 ppm CO2 in 
the atmosphere to make it warm enough to trigger this runaway greenhouse", i.e. 
boil the oceans away.  He said this was a finding in the Goldblatt 
et.al<http://et.al>.  Low simulated radiation limit for runaway greenhouse 
climates<http://www.nature.com/ngeo/journal/v6/n8/full/ngeo1892.html> paper 
published at that time.  He was 
quoted<http://www.nbcnews.com/science/science-news/runaway-greenhouse-easier-trigger-earth-thought-study-says-f6C10761164>
 in an NBC interview, saying this "really seems quite unlikely".

Would 30,000 ppm seem unlikely to Dr. Evil?  The man had a base on the Moon. Is 
ISIS just Dr. Evil diverting our attention from his extraterrestrial carbon 
import program?


On Saturday, September 27, 2014 5:48:55 PM UTC-7, andrewjlockley wrote:

If Dr Evil wanted to destroy the world with geoengineering, how easy would it 
be? How much super greenhouse gas would have to be released to boil the oceans? 
How much SRM would be needed to snowball the Earth?

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to