http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcb.12745/abstract

Agricultural peatland restoration: effects of land-use change on greenhouse
gas (CO2 and CH4) fluxes in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta - Knox - 2014
- Global Change Biology - Wiley Online Library

Keywords:

carbon flux;drained;eddy covariance;greenhouse gas balance;land-use
change;methane;peatland;restored;rice;wetland

Abstract

Agricultural drainage of organic soils has resulted in vast soil subsidence
and contributed to increased atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2)
concentrations. The Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta in California was drained
over a century ago for agriculture and human settlement and has since
experienced subsidence rates that are among the highest in the world. It is
recognized that drained agriculture in the Delta is unsustainable in the
long-term, and to help reverse subsidence and capture carbon (C) there is
an interest in restoring drained agricultural land-use types to flooded
conditions. However, flooding may increase methane (CH4) emissions. We
conducted a full year of simultaneous eddy covariance measurements at two
conventional drained agricultural peatlands (a pasture and a corn field)
and three flooded land-use types (a rice paddy and two restored wetlands)
to assess the impact of drained to flooded land-use change on CO2 and
CH4 fluxes in the Delta. We found that the drained sites were net C and
greenhouse gas (GHG) sources, releasing up to 341 g C m−2 yr−1 as CO2 and
11.4 g C m−2 yr−1 as CH4. Conversely, the restored wetlands were net sinks
of atmospheric CO2, sequestering up to 397 g C m−2 yr−1. However, they were
large sources of CH4, with emissions ranging from 39 to 53 g C m−2 yr−1. In
terms of the full GHG budget, the restored wetlands could be either GHG
sources or sinks. Although the rice paddy was a small atmospheric CO2 sink,
when considering harvest and CH4emissions, it acted as both a C and GHG
source. Annual photosynthesis was similar between sites, but flooding at
the restored sites inhibited ecosystem respiration, making them net
CO2 sinks. This study suggests that converting drained agricultural peat
soils to flooded land-use types can help reduce or reverse soil subsidence
and reduce GHG emissions.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to