Thanks, Nils. What a relief global warming isn't a problem (at least not for the next 2 US congressional years). Does this mean I don't have to worry about ocean acidification either? But then why worry about shellfish when you can eat beef, or chicken McNuggets?
Greg >________________________________ > From: Motoko <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2014 11:52 AM >Subject: [geo] CATO against GE > > > >Hello list, > >the libertarian CATO institute is against geoengineering. (11.11.2014) >http://www.cato.org/blog/geo-engineering-climate-geo-bad-idea > >The reason is, that climate change is no problem at all. "Thankfully, most signs point to only a modest global temperature increase resulting from our fossil fuel usage—a rise that will be readily adapted to and which actually may work out to be more beneficial than detrimental." > >The author suggests that instead of going for GE you "just say 'No, thank you, I’d much rather take my chances with the climate that comes than risk the alternative.'" > >Regards >Nils > -- >You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >"geoengineering" group. >To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >email to [email protected]. >To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. >For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
