http://environmentalhumanities.org/archives/vol5/

Jonas Anshelm and Anders Hansson: The Last Chance to Save the Planet? An
Analysis of the Geoengineering Advocacy Discourse in the Public Debate

Abstract

Geoengineering, i.e., the deliberate manipulation of the global climate
using grand-scale technologies, poses new challenges in terms of
environmental risks and human–nature relationships. Until recently, these
technologies were considered science fiction, but they are now being
reconsidered by researchers, leading to an emerging public debate. Our aim
is to improve our understanding of the public discourse on geoengineering
in mass media. We analyze 1500 articles published from 2005 to 2013,
constructing four coherent storylines that represent most of the
geoengineering advocacy in the public discourse in mass media. We
scrutinize inconsistencies in this discourse and argue that geoengineering
may be the first example of a grand-scale technology that in some important
respects has clear postmodern tendencies: geoengineering advocacy, for
example, is not based on objective truth claims of the natural sciences and
does not promise a better world.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to