Poster's note : I'm not sure an unpacking of Greek mythology is quite on
topic, but it does seem to be influencing notable commentators on the
subject.

http://blog.practicalethics.ox.ac.uk/2014/12/prometheus-and-the-drive-to-mastery/

Prometheus and the Drive to Mastery
Dec 4th, 2014
Clarke, S.

Writers who express caution about the over-enthusiastic embrace of new
technologies, such as Michael Sandel, who worries about human enhancement
and genetic engineering, and Clive Hamilton, who worries about
geoengineering, sometimes warn us about the ‘Promethean attitude’, or ‘the
Promethean urge’. According to Sandel, human enhancement and genetic
engineering ‘… represent a kind of hyperagency – a Promethean aspiration to
remake nature, including human nature, to serve our purposes and satisfy
our desires. The problem is not the drift to mechanism but the drive to
mastery. And what the drive to mastery misses and many even destroy is an
appreciation of the gifted character of human powers and achievements’
(‘The Case against Perfection’, in J. Savulescu and N. Bostrom (eds.) Human
Enhancement, OUP 2012, p. 78). Hamilton worries about geoengineers who
desire ‘total domination of the planet’. He describes this desire as a
‘Promethean urge named after the Greek titan who gave to humans the tools
of technological mastery’ (Earthmasters, Yale 2013, p. 18).

Many proponents of genetic engineering, human enhancement and
geoengineering would protest at these descriptions. They might seek to
alter certain aspects of human nature, or prevent deleterious changes to
the Earth’s climate, however they do not usually think of themselves as
seeking total control. But perhaps they are possessed by urges that they do
not acknowledge, or that they are unaware of? Perhaps Sandel and Hamilton
are pointing to the myth of Prometheus as a warning about such hidden urges?

There are various different myths about Prometheus. He is credited with
providing human with architecture, astronomy, mathematics, the art of
writing, the treatment of domestic animals, navigation, medicine and
metallurgy. But although these arts help humans to make their way in the
world, they seem to fall far short of providing us with mastery. Prometheus
does not actually seem very interested in enabling humans to achieve
mastery. He is also said to have deprived humans of knowledge of the
future. If Prometheus’ aim was to enable us to master nature then depriving
us of knowledge of the future would seem to be a very odd way to achieve
that aim. If we knew what the future held then it would be much easier for
us to master nature than it is now.Prometheus is perhaps best known for
giving humans the gift of fire. But it turns out, if the myth is to be
believed, that we humans already had the gift of fire, but that this was
taken away from us by Zeus, as a way of punishing Prometheus, who cared
about humans. It seems that he earned this indirect punishment by playing a
trick on Zeus, which benefited humanity – it’s complicated and has to do
with preventing Zeus from fully benefitting from the sacrifices that humans
made— and Zeus responded by withholding fire from humans. However,
Prometheus stole the gift of fire and returned it to humans … and that’s
when Zeus got really nasty. He had Prometheus chained to a pillar and
tormented by an eagle which consumes his liver. At night his liver is
restored and this allows the eagle to return and consume his liver once
again, and so on ad infinitum. Prometheus’ mistake was not that he sought
to enable humans to control nature, but that he dared to defy Zeus, a more
powerful supernatural being. To Zeus, whether humans have the gift of fire
or not appears to be a side issue. Prometheus was punished for returning
the gift of fire to humans, but after meting out a harsh punishment Zeus
seemed to have lost interest in the issue of whether or not humans
continued to possess the gift of fire. At any rate, he allowed humans to
continue to possess the gift of fire and, indeed, we still have it.

The charge that others possess a ‘Promethean’ drive to mastery is one that
Sandel and Hamilton are quick to make. But they do not provide sufficient
evidence to establish that any of their targets possess such a drive and
they appear to misunderstand the myth of Prometheus when they associate his
name with that charge.

Categories: Biotechnology, Enhancement, Environmental Ethics,geoengineering,

Tags: Clive Hamilton, genetic engineering, geoengineering,human
enhancement, mastery, Michael Sandel, myth,Promethean attitude, Prometheus

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to