Andrew and list:
This note intended as a warning - mainly that this article (dealing
almost entirely with patent issues) is from 2010. The term “geoengineering” is
intended to mean (mainly - not entirely) solar geoengineering.
My personal view is that patents in much/most of the CDR world are
probably a help - as IP is the main way to raise needed funds. I hope Chris
Avery and/or others from the UM can comment on this missing aspect of their
study, some 5 years later.
Ron
On Mar 18, 2015, at 2:59 AM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote:
> Attached
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> <Chris Avery.pdf>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
