PS to last Hello Eric, Many apologies for my post-midnight slips. Although I think the the difference in costs between the 2 systems is not as important as the fact that both systems are extremely inexpensive , my long-standing collaborator Stephen Salter has conducted careful & comprehensive cost calculations which indicate that MCB is cheaper than the sulphur technique. I'm sure that he'd provide you with a copy of his calculations ,[ [email protected]] Best Wishes John [John Latham, [[email protected]]
On Sun, May 31, 2015 at 12:53 PM, Dr D <[email protected]> wrote: > I've watch the recent Cafe Scientifique videos on aerosol SRM and MCB. And > I've read dozens of articles on both. But I've yet to see a comparison of > the two approaches? Can anyone point me to a paper comparing the two > approaches (MCB v. stratospheric injection of aerosol)? Many thanks. > > Eric Durbrow > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
