"My argument here is that such methods of geoengineering inject disturbances 
into the algae-ocean-earth system that do not seek control, but to elicit 
surprise and explicate the mechanisms of the complex permutations of their 
unpredictability, where new forms of knowledge and value are created not 
through the application of preconceived ideas or a process of commensuration, 
but through the harnessing of anticipation and the generation of surprise."

Who knew?  As for injecting disturbances, surprise, unpredictbility into the 
algae-ocean-earth system, it would seem that our unabated injection of CO2 into 
the atmosphere and, hence, the ocean is doing a pretty good job.  What then are 
the better remedies should our current behavior continue, and doesn't science 
and research on such remedies reduce surprise and unpredictability of their 
application e.g. as demonstrated in our treatment of disease and medicine, etc?

Anyway, the article is paywalled.

For a contrasting view of the potentialities, I recommend: 
http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol54/iss1/5/
 
Greg


On Jul 14, 2015, at 12:30 AM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote:

http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/17530350.2015.1039459#_=_
The Experimental Economy of Geoengineering
Simon Factor

Journal of Cultural Economy
Published online: 03 Jul 2015
DOI: 10.1080/17530350.2015.1039459
Will the practical application of geoengineering technologies inadvertently 
bring about the catastrophic futures they are meant to pre-empt? And is such 
elicitation of unpredictability as unintended as it might appear – the 
accidental consequence of the extension of a modernist attitude to control and 
domesticate nature? To grasp what is at stake in such questions, this paper 
traces out the marginal history of ocean geoengineering, its correlative 
‘green’ economy, and through the deployment of algae as an inventive 
world-remaking device, their co-formation of the earth as a site of unbounded 
experimentation – of what I call experiment earth. My argument here is that 
such methods of geoengineering inject disturbances into the algae-ocean-earth 
system that do not seek control, but to elicit surprise and explicate the 
mechanisms of the complex permutations of their unpredictability, where new 
forms of knowledge and value are created not through the
 application of preconceived ideas or a process of commensuration, but through 
the harnessing of anticipation and the generation of surprise. How, I ask, are 
we to understand the lineaments of a pre-emptive ‘green’ economy that is 
premised on not just managing, but speculatively materially recomposing the 
non-linear chemical and ecological constitution of the earth’s metabolism? And 
what, from this vantage point, is the earth becoming?
keywords : geoengineering; experiment; green capitalism; pre-emption; inventive 
methods



-- 

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].

To post to this group, send email to [email protected].

Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to