I don't see where this paper addresses my principal concern about long-term sequestration, which is precisely that: how can we be sufficiently confident without a 3000 year experimental baseline that sequestration as implemented will endure for 3000 years? How can we exclude either imperfectly understood natural phenomena, imperfect execution, or unanticipated anthropogenic behaviors? In fact, this test lasted for 37 days (!). ᐧ
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 5:20 AM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote: > Attached > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
