Hi all, As you might know, I work primarily on the climate response to SRM and I'd like to know how we can better understand the implications of SRM and how those implications will depend on what we discover about its likely consequences. So if you have the time, I'd like all you social scientists, humanities researchers and philosophers of SRM to answer these 2 questions:
1) With regards to its consequences, what one thing would help you to better understand the implications of SRM for your area of interest? 2) What one thing do you wish that those of us working on the physical consequences of SRM would bear in mind? These don't have to be easily achievable and feel free to be controversial but I'd like to get a taste for what people feel we'll need to do to understand this issue better. Cheers, Pete -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
