Poster's note : Open access. Relevant criticism of BECCS as a central plank
of energy and carbon policy.

http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/7/8491/htm

Sustainability 2015, 7(7), 8491-8521; doi:10.3390/su7078491

Article
Are Biofuels an Effective and Viable Energy Strategy for Industrialized
Societies? A Reasoned Overview of Potentials and Limits
Tiziano Gomiero
Independent Consultant and Researcher on Multi-Criteria Farming and Food
System Analysis, Agro-Energies, Environmental Issues, Treviso 30121, Italy;
E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +39-32-0464-3496
Academic Editor: Andrew Kusiak
Received: 7 April 2015 / Accepted: 26 June 2015 / Published: 30 June 2015

Abstract

: In this paper, I analyze the constraints that limit biomass from becoming
an alternative, sustainable and efficient energy source, at least in
relation to the current metabolism of developed countries. In order to be
termed sustainable, the use of an energy source should be technically
feasible, economically affordable and environmentally and socially viable,
considering society as a whole. Above all, it should meet society’s
“metabolic needs,” a fundamental issue that is overlooked in the mainstream
biofuels narrative. The EROI (Energy Return on Investment) of biofuels
reaches a few units, while the EROI of fossil fuels is 20–30 or higher and
has a power density (W/m2) thousands of times higher than the best
biofuels, such as sugarcane in Brazil. When metabolic approaches are used
it becomes clear that biomass cannot represent an energy carrier able to
meet the metabolism of industrialized societies. For our industrial society
to rely on “sustainable biofuels” for an important fraction of its energy,
most of the agricultural and non-agricultural land would need to be used
for crops, and at the same time a radical cut to our pattern of energy
consumption would need to be implemented, whilst also achieving a
significant population reduction.
Keywords:
biofuels; carbon debt; climate change; energy efficiency; environmental
impact; EROI; food security; GHGs; power density; societal metabolism

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to