List:

        I listened for about 5 hours today to the NAS meeting identified below. 
 The meeting was very well done.  A video is promised  (I’ll pass on, if I get 
word later), but they said no transcript or other report on today will be 
coming.  

        The website link given below was 
http://sites.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/becs/dbasse_171101 
<http://sites.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/becs/dbasse_171101>

 - and this URL gives more:  
http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_171703.pdf
 
<http://sites.nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/dbassesite/documents/webpage/dbasse_171703.pdf>

        The acronym for the group is BECS (= Board on Environmental Change and 
Society;  part of the NAS Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and 
Education)  At least one participant noted the correspondence to BECCS.  The 
latter was a fairly large part of the second panel’s discussion on CDR (and a 
smaller bit on “Geo” and SRM).  Mine (on CDR) was the first of only two 
questions from the 200 listeners in addition to maybe 50 in the NAS auditorium 
- and might have generated some of the considerable amount on “geo” topics.   
Neither I nor any other used the word “biochar” - but there were comments that 
were relevant.  There was no mention of any “geo” topic during or after the 
first panel.

        All the panelists (mostly not members of the official BECS group) were 
knowledgeable on this combined social science / climate topic.  I am missing 
here a few other speakers (whose names are all on the agenda that can be found 
at the first link).  I have most of the names of those asking questions (mostly 
comments) after each panel - and they will be in the video when released.   A 
few good Ppt slides hopefully coming.

Here are the two panels:

Panel 1: The bottom-up approach for international agreements, and the 
uncertainties in meeting the climate targets of national climate plans 
Moderator: Richard Moss, Joint Global Change Research Institute, BECS Chair 
Guiding Questions: • What is understood about how bottom-up approaches work and 
achieve their objectives at the international level? • Are there examples that 
serve as guides (or warnings)? More generally, what do we know and still need 
to know about how different forms of international agreements result in 
emissions reductions? • What do Integrated Assessment Models (IAMs) indicate 
about the outcome of Paris agreements for global mean surface temperature? Do 
they make assumptions about behavioral and societal changes that might affect 
IAM results? • What role can NGOs play in achieving national climate plans and 
how can they be meaningfully engaged? 
David Victor, Director of the International Law and Regulation Laboratory, 
University of California-San Diego (Via WebEx) 
Nathan Hultman, University of Maryland 
Leon Clarke, Joint Global Change Research Institute 
Gavin Schmidt, Director NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies 
Keya Chatterjee, Executive Director US Climate Action Network

Panel 2: Institutional and behavioral responses to policy and technology 
initiatives 
Moderator: J. Timmons Roberts, Brown University, BECS member 
Guiding Questions: • What do we know about the social science of implementation 
of other similar programs in the past? What are the possibilities to improve 
implementation? • How do we keep the majority of fossil fuel in the ground as 
required to meet emissions targets? • What should we realistically expect in 
terms of emissions reduction, by economic sectors, by level (national, 
community, individual/household), and by types of tools adopted (such as market 
approaches, regulation, etc.)? • How do institutions support and thwart energy 
system transitions, including by affecting technological innovation and policy 
creation? 
Joseph Aldy, Harvard University 
Jennie Stephens, University of Vermont 
Michael Vandenbergh, Vanderbilt Law School 
Tom Dietz, Michigan State University

        I intend to follow this BECS group closely.  I heard a lot of good 
material.

        Anyone else have comments on this NAS social science (BECS) group or 
today’s program?

Ron


> Begin forwarded message:
> 
> From: "Tina M. Latimer" <[email protected]>
> Subject: Registration Confirmation
> Date: April 19, 2016 at 9:55:40 AM MDT
> To: Ronal Larson <[email protected]>
> 
> Dear Webcast Registrant -
>  
> Thank you for your interest in the Board on Environmental Change and Society 
> Seminar “Moving on From Paris: Implementation Lessons from Social Sciences”
>  
> The seminar will take place on April 28, 2016.  A detailed agenda and further 
> information can be found on our website 
> <http://sites.nationalacademies.org/dbasse/becs/dbasse_171101>.  The webcast 
> information will be e-mailed shortly before the seminar.
> 
> Please contact Tina M. Latimer (T <mailto:[email protected]>[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]> – (202) 334-3218) if you have any further questions 
> or concerns.
>  

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to