Exactly why a much broader NET policy and R&D focus is needed, and one that 
does not ignore the ocean.
Greg

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 14, 2016, at 12:57 AM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Attached letter (untitled) from 65 scientists protesting the US approach to 
> forest biofuels.
> 
> This shows generally that expansion of biofuels as a precondition to BECCS 
> will neither be easy nor uncontroversial.
> 
> A
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
> <document_cw_03.pdf>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to