https://www.theengineer.co.uk/new-project-promises-co2-capture-at-30-per-tonne/
Potential relevance to BECCS? However, making molecular CO2 from dilute sources 
is still no slam dunk as noted by Tony:
"Tony Marshallsay 11th October 2016 at 12:20 pmAs a CCS skeptic, I have the 
following comments:
1. “claimed” $30/tonne: The proof of the pudding is in the eating
2. “reduce… to $10/tonne by 2018”: Wishful thinking
3. “zero-emission” because captured CO2 reused locally: OK – much better than 
sweeping the dust under the carpet.
4. “20% reduction in energy costs”: Presumably relative to use of another 
(unspecified) solvent in a similar process for the same quantity of capture?
5. “8 times less solvent loss”: I dislike this fashionable expression, which is 
open to misinterpretation. Why didn’t they say so many % reduction, as for 
energy?
6. The environmental impact of the lost solvent (unspecified but identified in 
linked article as APBS – a very variable mixture of possibly toxic chemicals) 
is not mentioned.
7. “7 times reduction in corrosion”: See #5 above.
8. Has the cost of regular replacements for corroded parts (together with the 
environmental impact of their production) and of the plant refurbishment and 
downtime (during which I assume capture will be maintained by a standby?) been 
included in the $30 figure?
9. For comparison purposes, what would be the carbon footprint (tonnes of CO2) 
of the manufacture and installation of this proposed CCS plant?"
GR - How much cheaper and safer would it be to make products directly from CO2 
without having to recycle expensive, corrosive, toxic chemicals - e.g. Skyonic, 
AWL, etc.?
 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to