This is an interesting article that breaks down the state by state results by industry sector in a way that suggests a more granular rethink of climate change policy is needed than I think your article suggests. Not being negative, just suggesting that success might require rebuilding climate change coalition state by state getting states to buy in bottom up than from national level top down with states seen more as blockers.
http://www.forbes.com/sites/joelkotkin/2016/11/09/donald-trumps-presidenti-victory-demographics/#7d88d72f79a8 ᐧ On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 2:59 PM, barteau <bart...@umich.edu> wrote: > I have just published the piece at the link below. > Mark Barteau > > http://theconversation.com/what-president-trump-means- > for-the-future-of-energy-and-climate-68045 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
