I hope this has not been posted. It introduces a new (?) acronym
"Biochar-Bioenergy System" BCBES. - But I cannot find a paper on that.






Researchers Propose New Biochar Technique to Scrub Atmospheric Carbon

By Sam Nadell

Three million years ago, there were no humans, global temperatures were
possibly four degrees celsius warmer and sea levels were high enough to
cover most of modern-day Manhattan. This was also the last time in geologic
history that global atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) levels exceeded 400
parts per million (ppm), a benchmark that was permanently and ominously
passed once again in 2016.

Carbon emissions, largely as a result of burning fossil fuels, are not
likely to halt anytime soon. Some scientists have started organizing backup
plans; most notably, finding a way to grab some of this atmospheric carbon
and store it in the Earth.

"The critical thing at this point in time is to reduce emissions as rapidly
as we are able to do so. However, in the event that we cannot, as a global
community, manage to reduce emissions fast enough, we will still end up with
a surplus of CO2 in the atmosphere that we need to deal with," said Dr.
Dominic Woolf, soil and crop sciences, and lead author of a recent study
that focussed on a new way to sequester more CO2 into the Earth and out of
the atmosphere.

Leaderboard 1

"We need a plan B, because it looks like we may not get there fast enough or
quick enough. Plan B is how we get that carbon back down out of the
atmosphere," Woolf said.

Dawit Solomon, a soil scientist at Cornell University, investigates the
carbon accumulated in Liberian soil due to indigenous agricultural

Plan B, in Woolf's case, is to use a "Biochar-Bioenergy System" . BCBES
involves using a technique called pyrolysis, the burning of plant material
in the absence of oxygen. By doing so, half of the original carbon in the
plant remains in the leftover biomass, now called biochar.

BCBES has been proposed by Woolf and other researchers as a substitute for
"Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage" , a similar method of carbon
sequestration that captures CO2 from plants through combustion.

Leaderboard 2

Although BECCS may be a more effective way to remove and store CO2, there
are several advantages to using BCBES instead. A bioenergy capture system
requires a large carbon transportation network and therefore a lot of
capital for infrastructure, while a biochar system could be implemented in
more remote areas.

Biochar can also be added to infertile soils in order to increase
agricultural productivity, which could be used to offset some of the costs
associated with BCBES.

"Plants already draw down 10 times as much carbon as we're emitting at the
moment globally," Woolf said.

Under normal conditions, approximately 90 percent of that carbon would be
returned to the Earth or atmosphere through burning or plant decay over a
three year period. Pyrolysis, on the other hand, releases 50 percent of
plant carbon instantly, but stores the rest in biochar for a significantly
longer duration.

Woolf suggests using BCBES and BECCS in tandem for now, transitioning to
using BECCS once it becomes more economically viable. Other carbon
sequestration techniques, such as reforestation or direct carbon capture,
either require too much land and money to implement or are too
under-developed to be used immediately.

However, Woolf stresses that the main goal right now must be to reduce CO2
emissions and said that these proposed techniques are not a panacea for the
warming climate. Keeping CO2 levels under 450 ppm is critical, as scientists
have warned that crossing that threshold will likely have irreversible
effects on the environment. In order to do so, Woolf urges that "we've got
to move rapidly and drastically as a global effort."

"By 2100, our key driving motivation must be to keep any change that does
happen within manageable levels and the more we can mitigate, the better it
is. And it's clear that bioenergy-biochar systems will have a role to play
in that," he said. "The less we manage to reduce emissions, the larger the
role these other technologies will have to have. But we shouldn't see them
as a get-out or a substitute for reducing emissions."



You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to