For those unfamiliar with Chaoborus, the phantom midge, here is a larval one 
swallowing a copepod.

[cid:[email protected]]
On Mar 17, 2017, at 3:28 PM, Greg Rau 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Thanks, Eric.  Chaoborus in lakes - that brings back some fond memories: 
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/f80-098#.WMxZAEu7YiE

Anyway, if these guys are messengers of methane, how about planting some fish 
to keep their numbers down? World wide aerial planting of fish should do the 
trick. Maybe we can team up with the SRM planes/rockets - death to global 
warming from above and below ;-)  On the other hand, if Chaoborus do stir up 
the sediment as bemoaned in the article, that's not a bad thing from a methane 
standpoint. Stirring up sediment increases aeration and suppresses methane 
production(?) Test - section off a lake into 4 sections 1)+Chaoborus, -fish, 2) 
+Chaoborus, +fish, 3) -Chaoborus, + fish, and 4) -Chaoborus, -fish. Which one 
gives off the least methane? OK, maybe you'd need 4 lakes, each with a 
different treatment. To be a well-funded, biogeochemistry/ecology graduate 
student again….

Anyway, I'll be in Geneva in late April, and could check in with the lead 
author for a full debriefing.

Greg



________________________________
From: Eric Durbrow <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: geoengineering 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2017 4:59 AM
Subject: [geo] A novel target for climate engineering? Fly larvae in freshwater



The gist: a particular species of fly uses methane to keep its larva near the 
surface in freshwater. That is about 2k to 130k larva per 1 meter2 of 
freshwater. But methane use by the larva increases in dirty water. So keep 
freshwater from becoming dirty e.g. agricultural run-off might decrease methane 
release from freshwater…

Summary at: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/03/170314081612.htm

Abstract at: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep44478

Question: Is this research being overly hyped or is decreasing methane release 
even a few percent from freshwater a Very Big Deal?


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to