So CDR is OK?
> On Apr 5, 2017, at 1:26 PM, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://www.etcgroup.org/content/why-srm-experiments-are-bad-idea > > › > Why SRM experiments are a bad idea > Submitted on 28 March 2017 > > Solar Radiation Management (SRM) describes a set of geoengineering techniques > that aim to counter human-made climate change by artificially increasing the > reflection of heat from sunlight (solar radiation) back into space. Some > advocates have started using the term “solar geoengineering” – but these > techniques are not related to solar power production. > > SRM encompasses a variety of techniques: using reflective “pollution” to > modify the atmosphere, covering deserts with reflective plastic, increasing > the whiteness of clouds or blocking incoming sunlight with “space shades.” > The most-promoted proposal is to create dust clouds that artificially mimic > “volcano clouds” by injecting layers of reflective particles, such as > sulfates, into a higher layer of the atmosphere called the stratosphere. > > This briefing outlines the ethical, political and environmental arguments > against solar radiation management (SRM), and explains why even SRM > experiments are a bad idea. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "geoengineering" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
