Thought these were also key extracts:

 
"Saudi Arabia suggested including geoengineering options like carbon capture 
under the seabed and ocean fertilization. The US, the UK, Spain and others 
suggested that geoengineering be included in AR6 rather than in the SRs. WGI 
Co-Chair Masson- Delmotte responded that geoengineering will be a topic for all 
three WGs in AR6."

"Saudi Arabia, supported by Egypt, lamented that their proposal to include 
geoengineering was not reflected in the revised outline and that blue carbon 
was not more prominently reflected, and requested considering the interaction 
between dust and oceans as well as explicit reference to the UNFCCC."

(Context: discussing outline of IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Oceans 
and the Cryosphere -SROCC)



Other highlights of this ENB:

- Long discussion of whether the IPCC should accept private / philanthropic 
funding, noting that the US has been a major funder of the Panel to date 
(similar to recent discussions of external funding wrt to geo)

- Discussion about the thorny problem of political vs. scientific terminology 
around loss & damage, and "the need for a science-based term to describe 
“catastrophic realities” if “loss and damage” is deemed inadequate”

- Opening speech by state governor of Jalisco noted Jalisco's "position at the 
forefront of resistance against “stupidity” and against the industrial 
interests that deny the reality of climate change."



> On Apr 6, 2017, at 03:11, Andrew Lockley <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Key extract :
> 
> France, supported 
> by Spain, favored considering geoengineering in AR6, not in the 
> SRs. ETC Group, supported by Germany, opposed reference to 
> geoengineering in both AR6 and the SRs.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> <enb12690e.pdf>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to