(Sent in a private capacity) Attached are my comments on this consultation http://www.ucalgary.ca/grgproject/request-public-comments-1
In its current form the document has several systematic weaknesses 1) Ignores the potential for trivial, small-scale deployments journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1461452916630082 2) Imposes cumbersome, unnecessary bureacracy 3) Holds geoengineering activities to an absurdly higher standard than applies to the ongoing emissions of GHGs - including, it appears, to impose a moratorium on deployment. 4) Assumes/endorses a statist approach to research and deployment, when many alternative non-state models of research and deployment may exist jetpress.org/v26.1/lockley.htm 5) Uses ambiguous language in several key instances A -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
Calgary consultation feedback.docx
Description: MS-Word 2007 document
