Thanks for posting this, Andrew. Failing to factor in marine biomass potential, as a viable biomass source for such power plants, may possibly be a significant flaw in the design of this study.
Marine biomass production does not carry the same significant carbon or resources penalty as a terrestrial based biomass supply. Also, pyrolysis power plants, as opposed to typical biomass burning plants, provides us with biochar. Crafting a second study, which incorporates this broader System of Systems thinking, may be the most productive use of research funds on this subject. I hope these authors gain interest in and funding for such a follow-on study. Best regards, Michael -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
