It seems that the lithium is not consumed as the end product is C and O2.  If 
the lithium electrode can process one CO2 per lithium every minute, then 1 mole 
of lithium would process about 500 kilomol of CO2 per year.   Even if you need 
to replace the lithium a few times over the course of a year, this is not a bad 
deal.  Electrochemical processes are fast.  Therefore, the annual ratios are 
bit misleading.  Dimensionally, you need the lifetime of the lithium electrode, 
and the time it takes to cycle a single Li through the cycle.  The ratio 
between carbon processed and Li lost can be huge

Klaus

From: <[email protected]> on behalf of "Rau, Greg" <[email protected]>
Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Date: Thursday, August 17, 2017 at 11:55 AM
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, geoengineering 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [geo] Re: Lithium-CO2 tech and CO2 extraction

OK, if metal global abundance is the issue how about Fe-CO2 fuel cells?: 
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196890403003078<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__web.anl.gov_PCS_acsfuel_preprint-2520archive_Files_49-5F1-5FAnaheim-5F03-2D04-5F0856.pdf&d=DwMFaQ&c=l45AxH-kUV29SRQusp9vYR0n1GycN4_2jInuKy6zbqQ&r=hFjA8A8KwwhQx5qilpfIleTL0XYVr_fckT8DnwIEWlQ&m=emrXUboyoBC1O58DNdC6KJ3FVvBq04EePwXoHaTllRk&s=uLtpywcnEVm5WDofL-37jMVvM4gcVltlBRPUMNQW7-c&e=>
Competition for other Fe uses probably make this mute plus such fuel cells have 
not been demonstrated.  Or if you have some spare, non-fossil electricity 
laying around you can always make lots of environmentally-beneficial metal (Mg 
or Ca) (bi)carbonates from globally abundant base minerals and air CO2, while 
generating C-negative H2: 
http://www.pnas.org/content/110/25/10095.abstract<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__www.pnas.org_content_110_25_10095.abstract&d=DwMFaQ&c=l45AxH-kUV29SRQusp9vYR0n1GycN4_2jInuKy6zbqQ&r=hFjA8A8KwwhQx5qilpfIleTL0XYVr_fckT8DnwIEWlQ&m=emrXUboyoBC1O58DNdC6KJ3FVvBq04EePwXoHaTllRk&s=pTQVvCxwT7YTaCCrkQQN7RycIx0fWxzKxeAx9oFhxWo&e=>
   OK, I’m not making elemental C or conc CO2, but I don’t think we need to.
Greg

From: geoengineering 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> on 
behalf of Russell Seitz / Bright Water 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Date: Monday, August 14, 2017 at 9:38 AM
To: geoengineering 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: [geo] Re: Lithium-CO2 tech and CO2 extraction

I'm puzzled that this should be produced without  dimensional analysis :

Globlal annual  CO2 production from fossil fuel exceeeds  20 kilomoles per 
capita.
Global lithium production last year  amounted to less than 1 mole per capita

Global  lithium reserves are on the order  of  1 kilomole per capita.


The question will remain  theoretical until a  lithium produced from sea water 
hits the market at close to currrent prices,

On Wednesday, August 9, 2017 at 5:57:38 PM UTC-4, E Durbrow wrote:


If I understand this correctly, researchers have developed a way to take a 
stream of pure CO2 and extract oxygen and carbon at very high efficiency. At 
least according to the summary, ambient stream may be possible and efficient.

summary: 
https://phys.org/news/2017-08-battery-inspired-strategy-carbon-fixation.html<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__phys.org_news_2017-2D08-2Dbattery-2Dinspired-2Dstrategy-2Dcarbon-2Dfixation.html&d=DwMFaQ&c=l45AxH-kUV29SRQusp9vYR0n1GycN4_2jInuKy6zbqQ&r=hFjA8A8KwwhQx5qilpfIleTL0XYVr_fckT8DnwIEWlQ&m=emrXUboyoBC1O58DNdC6KJ3FVvBq04EePwXoHaTllRk&s=EwdPLtJ8fav73B7WXyENrlyOdKsOqxfwkpV4jqqt2fE&e=>

P.S. I tried to find the abstract but could not get to it. Perhaps not out yet.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at 
https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_group_geoengineering&d=DwMFaQ&c=l45AxH-kUV29SRQusp9vYR0n1GycN4_2jInuKy6zbqQ&r=hFjA8A8KwwhQx5qilpfIleTL0XYVr_fckT8DnwIEWlQ&m=emrXUboyoBC1O58DNdC6KJ3FVvBq04EePwXoHaTllRk&s=QgZSnposDcJ3qi43pLV1M7NZXpiTK3mUiMQMaXIBsyw&e=>.
For more options, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/optout<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwMFaQ&c=l45AxH-kUV29SRQusp9vYR0n1GycN4_2jInuKy6zbqQ&r=hFjA8A8KwwhQx5qilpfIleTL0XYVr_fckT8DnwIEWlQ&m=emrXUboyoBC1O58DNdC6KJ3FVvBq04EePwXoHaTllRk&s=uGG3xM457zttvQhCKroabTHTfdxmDve7Zhg0LxerFMI&e=>.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
To post to this group, send email to 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.
Visit this group at 
https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_group_geoengineering&d=DwMFaQ&c=l45AxH-kUV29SRQusp9vYR0n1GycN4_2jInuKy6zbqQ&r=hFjA8A8KwwhQx5qilpfIleTL0XYVr_fckT8DnwIEWlQ&m=emrXUboyoBC1O58DNdC6KJ3FVvBq04EePwXoHaTllRk&s=QgZSnposDcJ3qi43pLV1M7NZXpiTK3mUiMQMaXIBsyw&e=>.
For more options, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/optout<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__groups.google.com_d_optout&d=DwMFaQ&c=l45AxH-kUV29SRQusp9vYR0n1GycN4_2jInuKy6zbqQ&r=hFjA8A8KwwhQx5qilpfIleTL0XYVr_fckT8DnwIEWlQ&m=emrXUboyoBC1O58DNdC6KJ3FVvBq04EePwXoHaTllRk&s=uGG3xM457zttvQhCKroabTHTfdxmDve7Zhg0LxerFMI&e=>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to