https://www.nature.com/articles/nclimate3369.epdf?shared_access_token=LdBahNHxXVicUkN3cpNUW9RgN0jAjWel9jnR3ZoTv0PD0Qp6NADkmumuvK0eBm_zLR_yi6_Mn__ST5BsHucMcCYxPxirYX1oiUOsklpKxeQomkEpTSS8weYzhwHHv_DShNwTUHocIX6dLGNHLLQfY153ApflIuLUU6Nhbgyf1yI%3D "To meet the global scale required, countries that are the biggest electricity consumers must provide the bulk of the BECCS, as they have the largest capacity to remove CO2. Countries with the largest potential to produce bioenergy, which may differ to the largest energy consumers, would experience large impacts on their land sector, further exacerbating CBDR issues." GR - (Again) a policy discussion that assumes that land biomass energy with geologic C storage is and will be our only negative emissions energy option, ignoring ocean-based and/or abiotic negative energy systems +/- ocean C storage. What would the policy and geopolitical landscape look like if 70% of the Earth's surface was not ignored in the analysis? See our comment here http://science.sciencemag.org/content/356/6339/706/tab-e-letters -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
