Just to back up a bit, what exactly qualifies as DAC?Greg

      From: Klaus Lackner <[email protected]>
 To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>; David Sevier 
<[email protected]> 
Cc: Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>; geoengineering 
<[email protected]>
 Sent: Monday, September 18, 2017 11:47 AM
 Subject: Re: [geo] nuclear powered DAC
   
#yiv8818218149 #yiv8818218149 -- _filtered #yiv8818218149 {panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 
6 3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv8818218149 {font-family:Calibri;panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 
3 2 4;} _filtered #yiv8818218149 {font-family:Baskerville;panose-1:2 2 5 2 7 4 
1 2 3 3;}#yiv8818218149 #yiv8818218149 p.yiv8818218149MsoNormal, #yiv8818218149 
li.yiv8818218149MsoNormal, #yiv8818218149 div.yiv8818218149MsoNormal 
{margin:0in;margin-bottom:.0001pt;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv8818218149 a:link, 
#yiv8818218149 span.yiv8818218149MsoHyperlink 
{color:blue;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8818218149 a:visited, #yiv8818218149 
span.yiv8818218149MsoHyperlinkFollowed 
{color:purple;text-decoration:underline;}#yiv8818218149 p 
{margin-right:0in;margin-left:0in;font-size:12.0pt;}#yiv8818218149 
span.yiv8818218149hoenzb {}#yiv8818218149 span.yiv8818218149EmailStyle19 
{font-family:Calibri;color:windowtext;}#yiv8818218149 span.yiv8818218149msoIns 
{text-decoration:underline;color:teal;}#yiv8818218149 
.yiv8818218149MsoChpDefault {font-size:10.0pt;} _filtered #yiv8818218149 
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}#yiv8818218149 div.yiv8818218149WordSection1 
{}#yiv8818218149 Yes, it could be used to provide low grade heat. Particularly 
in remote areas.  Whether it is cheap enough is not clear to me.       From: 
<[email protected]> on behalf of Peter Eisenberger 
<[email protected]>
Reply-To: Peter Eisenberger <[email protected]>
Date: Monday, September 18, 2017 at 7:25 AM
To: David Sevier <[email protected]>
Cc: Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>, geoengineering 
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [geo] nuclear powered DAC    Cogenerating DAC and nuclear power if 
nuclear power produces low cost electricity where the low temperature heat such 
facilities struggle to get rid of  is used to run DAC makes alot of sense. Not 
sure that their are not lower cost ways to generate low temperature heat.  By 
the way something not mentioned much is nuclear fusion. Once nuclear fusion 
(mimicking solar reactions of the sun on the earth )  is proven commercially 
removing enfvironmental and other issues that plaqued fission reactions alot of 
the issues of the 24x7 dispatchable renewable energy grid go away by using some 
mixture of nuclear power and solar/wind .  I beleive in the long term fusion 
will be a major source of our energy.        On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 5:34 AM, 
David Sevier <[email protected]> wrote: 
In light of the thermal energy burden, I am wondering if you could combine a 
small nuclear pile such as a small modular swimming pool reactor (once 
described as the only nuclear power plant design that anyone ever made profit 
from) as a heat source without generating electricity with DAC. A number of DAC 
processes need heat either at or below 1000C. A small nuclear reactor should be 
able to supply this. If the requirement to raise steam and generate electricity 
are removed, the cost of the plant and the cost per KWH of heat should be 
significantly lower. Such an operation would not make sense in the early years 
of DAC but later when scale up becomes much larger and the world gets serious 
about DAC, then this could make sense. Look forward to comments and discussion. 
Swimming pool reactors had a good safety record (as far as I am aware), were 
not that expensive to build and were not terrible to decommission.      David 
Sevier Carbon Cycle Limited 248 Sutton Common Road Sutton, Surrey SM3 9PW 
England Tel 44 (0)208 288 0128 Fax 44 (0)208-288 0129   This email is private 
and confidential           -- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
[email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. 


    --  CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION: This email message and all attachments 
contain confidential and privileged information that are for the sole use of 
the intended recipients, which if appropriate applies under the terms of the 
non-disclosure agreement between the parties. -- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
[email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

 -- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


   

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to