Eric and list:

        Thanks for this CDR-type lead.  

Your link (a PR piece from Washington State University) gives this added 
information:

Marc G. Kramer, Kate Lajtha, Anthony Audfenkampe. Depth trends of soil organic 
matter C:N and 15N natural abundance controlled by association with minerals. 
Biogeochemistry, 2017; DOI: 10.1007/s10533-017-0378-x 
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10533-017-0378-x>
Robert B. Jackson, Kate Lajtha, Susan E. Crow, Gustaf Hugelius, Marc G. Kramer, 
Gervasio Piñeiro. The Ecology of Soil Carbon: Pools, Vulnerabilities, and 
Biotic and Abiotic Controls. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and 
Systematics, 2017; 48 (1): 419 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054234 
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-112414-054234>

        The second is non-fee (the first is not, but is on Research Gate); I 
found both quite helpful on soil carbon content.  There is no mention of CDR in 
either, but I think the huge soil losses that they report show that there is 
great potential in soil-based CDR methods, such as biochar.

        Example sentences from the second:  . "Globally, native soils lost on 
average 43.1 ± 1.1% of their original topsoil carbon after conversion to 
agriculture.”……….”The global SOC stock in the upper 2 m of soil is 2,273 Pg C, 
with the boreal forest biome containing 623 Pg, or 27% of the global total.   
(See the whole text before drawing conclusions;  this just to show the type of 
data provided.)

Ron


> On Nov 8, 2017, at 9:41 AM, Eric Durbrow <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Summary is here (and includes links to abstracts): 
> https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/11/171108092406.htm 
> <https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/11/171108092406.htm>
> 
> The gist: We probably have underestimated how much carbon can be stored in 
> agricultural soil minerals (found in the first 3 feet or so) and changes in 
> agricultural practices can significantly store more CO2.
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering 
> <https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to