https://www.cigionline.org/publications/developing-
national-strategy-climate-engineering-research-canada?
utm_source=author&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=cop23

Developing a National Strategy for Climate Engineering Research in Canada
CIGI Papers No. 153
PUBLISHED: NOVEMBER 2, 2017
AUTHOR:

   - A. NEIL CRAIK <https://www.cigionline.org/person/neil-craik>


   -
   -
   -
   
<https://twitter.com/share?text=Developing+a+National+Strategy+for+Climate+Engineering+Research+in+Canada&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.cigionline.org/publications/developing-national-strategy-climate-engineering-research-canada>
   -
   -
   
<?subject=Developing%20a%20National%20Strategy%20for%20Climate%20Engineering%20Research%20in%20Canada&body=From%20the%20Centre%20for%20International%20Governance%20Innovation:%20Developing%20a%20National%20Strategy%20for%20Climate%20Engineering%20Research%20in%20Canada%20%28https://www.cigionline.org/publications/developing-national-strategy-climate-engineering-research-canada%29>
   -
   -

Download PDF
<https://www.cigionline.org/sites/default/files/documents/Paper%20no.153.pdf>

Climate engineering (CE) is increasingly becoming an area of broad public
policy interest within international and domestic climate policy
discussions. In addition to receiving greater attention within regulatory
contexts, there is a gradual shift toward greater support for nationally
supported research programs on CE technologies and assessments. Despite the
increased salience of CE, the issue has been largely absent from the
Canadian public policy agenda. This paper argues that a national strategy
for CE research ought to be developed as part of Canada’s broader climate
strategy. At the centre of this strategy must be a commitment to ensuring a
high level of public trust in the underlying science and a policy process
that is open and responsive to public views.

The development of a national CE research strategy is necessary because
governance of CE cannot be undertaken in the absence of greater knowledge
of CE technologies and their potential impacts. In addition, development of
other climate responses, such as mitigation and adaption strategies, will
need to be understood in light of the risks of CE, but also the risks
associated with forgoing these technologies. As CE technologies become
subject to increasing international oversight, the Canadian government
needs to develop a greater understanding of these technologies as part of a
coherent national position on CE.

The key elements of a national strategy for CE research should include:

   - dedicated funding for CE research;
   - federal oversight of outdoor research activities that is proportional
   to the risks; and
   - public engagement on the desirability of including different CE
   technologies as part of Canada’s portfolio of responses to climate change.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to geoengineering@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to