I think another issue is that you'd need to have mega-ton delivery capacity
ready to go within a timescale of months. I don't see this being built up
without there being a plan to use it. I agree with Andy that it seems wiser
to start slowly than piggy-back off of a volcanic eruption
On Tuesday, 13 March 2018 00:38:24 UTC-4, Andrew Lockley wrote:
> Volcanoes cause sudden cooling. This could be used to start
> There's been a lot of discussion on termination shock, but the concept of
> reverse termination shock (or volcanic start) has not had widespread
> I've also seen significant discussion of a volcanic eruption during
> geoengineering, but I've never seen the idea suggested of using a volcano
> to start geoengineering.
> The logic is fairly straightforward : if a volcano causes a lot of
> cooling, you can just carry on with the cooling artificially.
> In the next few decades there's potentially going to be a volcano that
> causes 0.5-2C cooling. This is potentially a good time to start - although
> we won't know when it will be.
> Thoughts are welcome
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.