https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771


× <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
[image: The Ecological Society of America]
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/>
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>

<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/showLogin?uri=%2Fdoi%2F10.1002%2Feap.1771>
  <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#main1>

   - <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>


   - <http://www.esa.org/esa/membership-services/joinrenew/>
   - <http://www.esa.org/>
   - <https://eservices.esa.org/Eservices/Contacts/Sign_In.aspx>

Ecological Applications
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/19395582> Volume 0,
Issue 0 <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/toc/19395582/0/0>
Article

Open Access
<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/>
Expected limits on the ocean acidification buffering potential of a
temperate seagrass meadow
David A. Koweek
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/doSearch?ContribAuthorStored=Koweek%2C+David+A>


Richard C. Zimmerman
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/doSearch?ContribAuthorStored=Zimmerman%2C+Richard+C>

Kathryn M. Hewett
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/doSearch?ContribAuthorStored=Hewett%2C+Kathryn+M>


Brian Gaylord
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/doSearch?ContribAuthorStored=Gaylord%2C+Brian>

 … See all authors
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
First published: 31 July 2018
https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1771

Corresponding Editor: Stephen Baines.
About <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>

   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#pane-pcw-figures>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#pane-pcw-references>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#pane-pcw-related>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#pane-pcw-details>

[image: PDF]
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/eap.1771>
Sections <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>

   -
   <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#d8741237>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#eap1771-sec-0001-title>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#eap1771-sec-0002-title>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#eap1771-sec-0014-title>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#eap1771-sec-0023-title>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#eap1771-sec-0035-title>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#support-information-section>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#references-section-1>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#eap1771-sec-0036-title>



<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>

   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/rightsLink?doi=10.1002%2Feap.1771&mode=>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1002%2Feap.1771>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/personalize/addFavoritePublication?doi=10.1002%2Feap.1771>
   -
   
<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/action/addCitationAlert?doi=10.1002%2Feap.1771>


<https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>


   - <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
   - <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
   - <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
   - <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
   - <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
   - <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
   - <https://esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.1771#>
   -

Abstract

Ocean acidification threatens many marine organisms, especially marine
calcifiers. The only global‐scale solution to ocean acidification remains
rapid reduction in CO2 emissions. Nevertheless, interest in localized
mitigation strategies has grown rapidly because of the recognized threat
ocean acidification imposes on natural communities, including ones
important to humans. Protection of seagrass meadows has been considered as
a possible approach for localized mitigation of ocean acidification due to
their large standing stocks of organic carbon and high productivity. Yet
much work remains to constrain the magnitudes and timescales of potential
buffering effects from seagrasses. We developed a biogeochemical box model
to better understand the potential for a temperate seagrass meadow to
locally mitigate the effects of ocean acidification. Then we parameterized
the model using data from Tomales Bay, an inlet on the coast of California,
USA which supports a major oyster farming industry. We conducted a series
of month‐long model simulations to characterize processes that occur during
summer and winter. We found that average pH in the seagrass meadows was
typically within 0.04 units of the pH of the primary source waters into the
meadow, although we did find occasional periods (hours) when seagrass
metabolism may modify the pH by up to ±0.2 units. Tidal phasing relative to
the diel cycle modulates localized pH buffering within the seagrass meadow
such that maximum buffering occurs during periods of the year with midday
low tides. Our model results suggest that seagrass metabolism in Tomales
Bay would not provide long‐term ocean acidification mitigation. However, we
emphasize that our model results may not hold in meadows where assumptions
about depth‐averaged net production and seawater residence time within the
seagrass meadow differ from our model assumptions. Our modeling approach
provides a framework that is easily adaptable to other seagrass meadows in
order to evaluate the extent of their individual buffering capacities.
Regardless of their ability to buffer ocean acidification, seagrass meadows
maintain many critically important ecosystem goods and services that will
be increasingly important as humans increasingly affect coastal ecosystems.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to