Hi Gideon this is an ambitious, but interesting project. The Environmental Defense Fund has a helpful list to start from: Here <https://www.edf.org/climate/our-position-geoengineering> I have attended UNEA4 and would be happy to chat about the positions and dynamics observed there. The reporting in news media was all based on second-hand information as far as I could tell and only showed a part of the picture as I've written elsewhere <https://geoengineering.environment.harvard.edu/blog/perspectives-unea-resolution#MatthiasHonegger> .
Best regards, Matthias Am Donnerstag, 13. Juni 2019 00:26:12 UTC+2 schrieb Gideon Futerman: > > Hi All, > I am about to undertake a project to essentially create an overview of the > state of play of SRM, particularly, although not exclusively, in the UK. > This is not an overview of the science of SRM, but of the policies of major > organisations. If any of you could be of any help in giving the information > below, that would be wonderful, and if anyone wants to be part of this > project and helping to research specific areas, please feel free to contact > us. I will post the overview as we are building it on this group. we are > looking for: > > - The policies or positions of major political parties, particularly > on a UK or European Level > - Any political actor with moderate interest in SRM > - The policies of major environmental NGOs > - The policies of other important civil society groups > - the position of influential scientists > - The position of important scientific institutions on SRM research > - Any examples of public education tools e.g. TV or museums, > presenting SRM, and the policy of these organisations towards discussing > SRM > - Positions of specific journalists on SRM > - Positions of energy companies on SRM > - Any military position, statement, research or interest in SRM > - Position of major professional organisations that may be > stakeholders in research and deployment of SRM e.g. engineering bodies, > climatology bodies etc. > - All major governance initiatives or ideas and their successes, > failures and difficulties thus far e.g. the Oxford Principles > - Information about UNEA in Nairobi this year, and the people > important in those specific discussions > - The individuals that drive the conversation around SRM > - Organisations specifically or substantially concerned with SRM, > their positions, funding levels, and amount of influenc > > Thanks anyone who wants to contribute by giving any information they > (especially if anyone can point me towards this being done before) or would > like to help us research, > Best Wishes, > Gideon > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/0ec6abf7-03e4-4a62-9dbb-8fd97197ad8a%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
