Still current, though. People were recently asking for position statements

On Mon, 1 Jul 2019, 12:31 Gernot Wagner, <[email protected]> wrote:

> This is from...2015.
>
> Gernot Wagner, New York University
> gwagner.com
>
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2019, 04:36 Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> https://www.edf.org/climate/our-position-geoengineering
>>
>> Our position on geoengineering
>> Based on our best understanding of the current science, EDF believes that:
>>
>> Reducing emissions of greenhouse gases as rapidly as possible is
>> essential to addressing the climate challenge facing humanity.
>> Deliberate climate interventions such as albedo modification should not
>> be undertaken for the foreseeable future as they present serious
>> ecological, moral and geopolitical concerns.
>> Engaging in transparent small-scale field research to further our
>> understanding of the climate system and the implications of any albedo
>> modification proposals is prudent and governance regimes should be
>> established in parallel with the very first experiments.
>> Research on development of carbon dioxide removal techniques and their
>> impacts should also be undertaken.
>> Geoengineering: Why it can't save the day
>> What environmental advocates are saying
>> EDF has played an early role in the NGO community in promoting governance
>> of climate engineering research. Increasing numbers of environmental NGOs
>> have joined us in this effort, and some of them have endorsed small-scale
>> research. For example, the Union of Concerned Scientists (UCS) stated its
>> support for a U.S. government-led SRM research program, but called for
>> guidance on governance before scaling up.
>>
>> Natural Resources Defense Council recently released a statement endorsing
>> small-scale research and World Wildlife Fund-UK is also "cautiously
>> supporting" it. Most other large environmental NGOs have taken mixed and
>> sometimes internally inconsistent positions on small-scale outdoor SRM
>> research.
>>
>> Friends of the Earth (FoE) International and FoE-U.S. oppose outdoor
>> research, while FoE-UK has taken a different position. At the United
>> Nations Convention on Biological Diversity, Greenpeace International
>> proposed language to ban all geoengineering activities but Greenpeace-UK
>> representatives have not taken the same approach in discussions in the UK.
>>
>> The most vehement opposition to research has come from The Action Group
>> on Erosion, Technology and Concentration (ETC), which has rallied dozens of
>> primarily small NGOs to its "Hands Off Mother Earth" campaign and recently
>> launched a website "to provide a space for critical perspectives, building
>> resistance and tracking developments." ETC has repeatedly lobbied at the
>> CBD for a complete moratorium on outdoor geoengineering research.
>>
>> At the other side of the spectrum, the Arctic Methane Emergency Group
>> urges deployment of geoengineering technologies as soon as possible to
>> "refreeze the Arctic," halt snow and sea ice decline and prevent rising
>> methane emissions from becoming a dominant climate forcing agent.
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "geoengineering" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
>> Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-06MN_xg%2B7y%2BMMwMXj59S3z9-vYyq-15_QiNsm0PtXrVOA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-06MN_xg%2B7y%2BMMwMXj59S3z9-vYyq-15_QiNsm0PtXrVOA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/geoengineering.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-07a%3DB4-zMqTcbfaJzb1OH_LS_pQJ%2BAhCeJ%3DH%2Biyu3jwUQ%40mail.gmail.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to