https://imccs.org/2020/02/13/release-international-military-council-issues-world-climate-and-security-report-2020-at-munich-security-conference/amp/?__twitter_impression=true

RELEASE: International Military Council Issues “World Climate and Security
Report 2020” at Munich Security Conference
[image: Caitlin Werrell and Francesco Femia] Caitlin Werrell and Francesco
Femia
5 days ago

Munich, Germany, February 13, 2020 —  This year climate change is more
central than ever at the Munich Security Conference (MSC), the leading
international forum for senior military, security and foreign policy
leaders, with the release of the inaugural “World Climate and Security
Report 2020 <http://www.imccs.org/report2020>” by the Expert Group of
the International
Military Council on Climate and Security <https://imccs.org/> (IMCCS). The
release will be announced by General (Ret) Tom Middendorp, Chair of the
IMCCS, at the conference’s “Apocalypse Now? – Climate and Security
<https://securityconference.org/en/msc-2020/for-the-public/>” opening event
at 16:15pm CET on February 13 (open to the public), followed by an MSC
event on the report at 16:00pm CET on February 15 (open to registered MSC
participants). The IMCCS is a group of senior military leaders, security
experts, and security institutions across the globe – currently from 32
countries in every hemisphere – dedicated to anticipating, analyzing, and
addressing the security risks of a changing climate.

The report <http://www.imccs.org/report2020> finds that security and
military experts are increasingly concerned about the security implications
of climate change, with many perceiving the risks to global security to be
significant or higher in the next two decades, and recommends “
*climate-proofing*” *international security* – including infrastructure,
institutions and policies – as well as major emissions reductions to avoid
significant-to-catastrophic security threats.

In highlighting the key findings of the report, and the rationale for
releasing it at the MSC, General Middendorp, former Chief of Defence of the
Netherlands, stated:

*“Climate change poses significant risks to global security, which could
become catastrophic in the next two decades. As this report, and the
32-country International Military Council on Climate and Security shows,
more and more military leaders are raising this alarm. It’s not just
environmentalists. The security community therefore has a responsibility to
prepare for and prevent these threats, including through climate-proofing
international security at all levels. That’s why we’ve brought the World
Climate and Security Report to the Munich Security Conference.” **– General
(Ret) Tom Middendorp, Chair, IMCCS*

The group’s Secretary General, the Honorable Sherri Goodman, former U.S.
Deputy Undersecretary of Defense and now Senior Strategist at the Center
for Climate and Security, stated:

*“Major and urgent global emissions reductions are necessary in order to
avoid significant, severe or catastrophic global security consequences in
the future. We also need to climate-proof all elements of security –
including infrastructure, institutions and policies. That’s our judgment
from a military perspective. For example, 93% of the climate security and
military experts surveyed in our World Climate and Security Report assess
that climate-driven water insecurity will pose a significant or higher risk
to global security by 2030. That’s unacceptable, and the world’s security
leaders must do as much as they can to avoid that future. We hope that the
Munich Security Conference is the beginning of a major effort by the
security community to address this global threat.”* *– The Honorable Sherri
Goodman, Secretary General, IMCCS*

Captain Steve Brock, U.S. Navy (Ret), Chief of Staff of the IMCCS, Senior
Advisor at the Council on Strategic Risks, and lead author on the report,
highlighted that though militaries are raising the alarm, most of the
solutions will be civilian.

*“The security landscape is going to be disrupted significantly as a result
of climate change. As military and security professionals, we are warning
the public about this threat, But the solutions will mostly be civilian.
That includes significant emissions reductions to avoid the worst effects
of climate change, and climate-proofing security – including by investing
heavily in the climate resilience of nations that need it in order to avoid
instability, conflict and major humanitarian disasters.” **– **Captain
Steve Brock, U.S. Navy (Ret), Chief of Staff, IMCCS*

Caitlin Werrell and Francesco Femia, Managers and Senior Advisors of the
IMCCS, and Co-Founders of the Center for Climate and Security, noted that
significant security risks will affect all regions of the globe, and not
just the most vulnerable:

*“All regions of the world are facing significant security risks from
climate change – not just the poorest, as we’re seeing in Australia and
around the world. Though fragile regions face the most severe consequences
in the short term, these risks are global and interconnected. The World
Climate and Security Report 2020 shows this clearly – from climate threats
to military bases and critical infrastructure in North America and the
Indo-Asia-Pacific, to climate-exacerbated political instability in the
Middle East, North Africa, Latin America and even Europe, nobody gets to
hide behind their gates to weather this storm. It’s hitting all of us. And
we all need to climate-proof our security.” **– **Caitlin Werrell and
Francesco Femia, Managers and Senior Advisors, IMCCS*

Louise van Schaik of the Planetary Security Initiative and Clingendael
Institute, who serves as Senior Member of the Executive Committee of the
IMCCS and lead author of the Military Best Practices on Climate and
Security chapter of the report, noted:

*“It is striking that climate change does not only have implications for
military missions abroad and threat analysis, but also directly undermines
military capabilities at home, because of the need to act more often as
first responders in the case of wildfires, floods and ice storms.
Militaries therefore must also climate-proof themselves.” **– Louise van
Schaik, Senior Member of the Executive Committee, IMCCS*

Bastien Alex, Senior Member of the Executive Committee of the IMCCS and
research fellow at IRIS, highlighted rising authoritarianism as an
impediment to global cooperation on addressing the threat, while also
calling for avoiding unintended security consequences with our responses.

“*As the report notes, ‘rising authoritarianism, sharpened global
competition and national agendas are hampering the needed cooperation* *among
nations to address the security risks of climate change.*’ *But as we
figure out what to do collectively to address this risk, we should be
careful. Some proposed solutions, including geoengineering, could create
disruptions to global security if not implemented carefully. So as we
climate-proof our policies and actions, we need to avoid unintended
consequences as much as possible.” **– Bastien Alex, Senior Member of the
Executive Committee, IMCCS*

Michel Rademaker, Senior Member of the Executive Committee of the IMCCS and
author of the Climate Security Game Results chapter of the report,
highlighted the foresight and preparedness opportunities that exist in the
world of strategic gaming.

*“When thinking about the possibilities to mitigate climate security risks
through climate-proofing, it is important to understand that there are
multiple ways of doing so*. *Through the Climate Security Strategic
Capability game, we’ve identified more than 40 specific capabilities that
can be utilized either independently or in tandem to help governments and
militaries prepare for these myriad and complex risks. Gaming them is a
useful way to create better awareness and understanding as well as helping
prioritize what to do next!”* – *Michel Rademaker, Senior Member of the
Executive Committee, IMCCS.*

While there has been a lot of progress over the past decades, with
militaries and security institutions increasingly analyzing and
incorporating climate change risks into their assessments, plans, and
policies, the “World Climate and Security Report 2020
<http://www.imccs.org/report2020>” shows that the risks are increasingly
urgent, and more must be done. This contributed to the report’s “Key Risks
and Opportunities” findings, which headline the publication and are
included below.

*Key Risks: Significant or higher risks to global security under current
circumstances*

   1. *Water insecurity a global security risk: *Climate change-exacerbated
   water insecurity is already a significant driver of instability, and
   according to 93% of climate security and military experts surveyed for this
   report, will pose a significant or higher risk to global security by 2030.
   2. *All regions facing increase in climate security risks (not just
   fragile/poor): *Though fragile regions of the world are facing the most
   severe and catastrophic security consequences of climate change, all
   regions are facing significant or higher security risks due to the global
   nature of the risks. For example, 86% of climate security and military
   experts surveyed for this report perceive climate change effects on
   conflict within nations to present a significant or higher risk to global
   security in the next two decades.
   3. *Military institutions are increasingly concerned about climate
   risks: *As reinforced by the 31 nations represented in the International
   Military Council on Climate and Security (IMCCS), an increasing number of
   national, regional and international security and military institutions are
   concerned about, and planning for, climate change risks to military
   infrastructure, force readiness, military operations, and the broader
   security environment.
   4. *Climate mitigation, adaptation  and resilience efforts are
   increasingly urgent to avert the significant security consequences of
   climate change*, yet some proposed solutions such as geoengineering
   could present  negative second-order effects to global security, if not
   implemented carefully.
   5. *Rising authoritarianism, sharpened global competition and national
   agendas are hampering the needed cooperation *among nations to address
   the security risks of climate change.

*Key Opportunities:* *A path forward for global security cooperation on
climate change*

   1. *National, regional, and international security institutions and
   militaries around the world should advance robust climate resilience
   strategies, plans and investments*, especially regarding climate
   implications for water and food security and their associated effects on
   stability, conflict and displacement, in their primary mission sets or
   lines of effort.
   2. *Security and military institutions should demonstrate leadership* on
   climate security risks and resilience and encourage governments to advance
   comprehensive emissions reductions and adaptation investments to avoid
   those security disruptions. Military organizations can also lead by example
   through taking advantage of the significant opportunities to adopt lower
   carbon energy sources, and make progress on other greenhouse gases beyond
   carbon dioxide.
   3. *Climate-proofing development assistance for vulnerable nations which
   are likely hotspots of instability and conflict, as well as
   climate-proofing other policies affecting those regions, should be a
   priority for conflict prevention*. Assistance should be aimed at climate
   resilience challenges such as water security, food security, and disaster
   preparedness.
   4. *The international community should embrace a Responsibility to
   Prepare and Prevent framework, given unprecedented foresight capabilities
   regarding the unprecedented risks of climate change*. This includes
   ensuring all levels of government and civil society, including all
   national, regional and international security institutions, are prepared
   for the security implications of climate change.
   5. *Security institutions around the globe should integrate climate
   knowledge and training into institutional frameworks to ensure that
   knowledge and understanding of climate change threats permeates the
   organizational culture*. For example, climate security curricula should
   be added to national and regional training and defense colleges,
   professional military education, and climate security should receive
   significant treatment in international security and military fora.

*Read the World Climate and Security Report 2020:* here
<http://www.imccs.org/report2020> or here
<http://www.climateandsecurity.org/worldclimatesecurityreport2020>

*Direct inquiries to:* Francesco Femia, [email protected], What’sApp:
+1-571-263-5691

*Find details of the report release at the Munich Security Conference:* here
<https://securityconference.org/en/msc-2020/>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-06e3fJ5Mn7FQ4UAOGhzBJrmfRWABFXCOrfU8w6q7e_QAA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to