https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/10/13/4637
The Buying Time Argument within the Solar Radiation Management Discourse by Frederike Neuber 1,* andKonrad Ott 2,* 1 Independent Researcher, Fohlengrund 36, D-18211 Rostock, Germany 2 Department of Environmental Philosophy and Ethics, Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Leibnizstr. 6, D-24118 Kiel, Germany * Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10(13), 4637; https://doi.org/10.3390/app10134637 Received: 11 June 2020 / Revised: 27 June 2020 / Accepted: 30 June 2020 / Published: 4 July 2020 (This article belongs to the Special Issue Solar Radiation: Measurements and Modelling, Effects and Applications) View Full-Text Download PDF Browse Figures Review Reports Cite This Paper Abstract In this article, we will establish a version of the buying time argument (BTA) in favor of Sulphur Aerosol Injection (SAI) Climate Engineering (CE). The idea is not to promote the deployment of such scheme, but rather to present the strongest possible argument pro SAI in order to look at its presuppositions, implications, critical points and uncertainties. In discussing BTA being the only morally sound argument in favor of SAI, the stakes and the overall framework will become visible. If, however, the strongest pro-SAI argument enables us to recognize some major flaws of this technology, this option should be disregarded -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-07w6mo4beaFWP%2BurLQTMCS4Qx4W3aQKuCm9uKR3-6POTg%40mail.gmail.com.
