https://news.trust.org/item/20201218140025-po1gu/

Planned Harvard balloon test in Sweden stirs solar geoengineering unease
by Alister Doyle | @alisterdoyle | Thomson Reuters Foundation
Friday, 18 December 2020 16:42 GMT
Image Caption and Rights Information
An early experiment toward using sun-dimming technology to cool global
warming has opponents fearing a slippery slope toward engineering the
climate
(Removes typo in paragraph 11)

By Alister Doyle

OSLO, Dec 18 (Thomson Reuters Foundation) - Harvard University scientists
plan to fly a test balloon above Sweden next year to help advance research
into dimming sunlight to cool the Earth, alarming environmentalists opposed
to solar geoengineering.

Open-air research into spraying tiny, sun-reflecting particles into the
stratosphere, to offset global warming, has been stalled for years by
controversies - including that it could discourage needed cuts in
greenhouse gas emissions.

In a small step, the Swedish Space Corporation agreed this week to help
Harvard researchers launch a balloon near the Arctic town of Kiruna next
June. It would carry a gondola with 600 kg of scientific equipment 20 km
(12 miles) high.

"There are very many real concerns" about the risks of climate change and
solar geoengineering, said David Keith, who is involved in the project and
is a professor of applied physics at the Harvard School of Engineering and
Applied Sciences.

"Understanding them requires a range of activities including experiments,"
said Keith, who is also a professor of public policy at the Harvard Kennedy
School.

The unmanned flight had originally been planned for the United States but
was moved, partly because of U.S. restrictions caused by coronavirus.

The flight, which requires approval from a Harvard project advisory
committee, will test how to manoeuvre the balloon and check communications
equipment and other systems. It would not release any particles into the
stratosphere.

Still, if successful, it could be a step towards an experiment, perhaps in
the autumn of 2021 or spring of 2022, to release a tiny amount – up to 2 kg
- of non-toxic calcium carbonate dust into the atmosphere, Keith said.

Studying that material's effects on high-altitude sunlight could help
advance understand of how solar geoengineering might work.

A SLIPPERY SLOPE?

But opponents see the Swedish balloon as a step on a slippery slope towards
engineering the climate with an artificial sunshade - something with
potentially large and hard-to-predict risks, such as shifts in global rain
patterns.

"There is no merit in this test except to enable the next step. You can't
test the trigger of a bomb and say ‘This can't possibly do any harm'," said
Niclas Hällström, director of the Swedish green think-tank WhatNext?

"Swedish society is increasingly calling for real, immediate solutions to
climate change," he said - such as a rapid transformation away from fossil
fuels and toward a zero-carbon society.

He said the Harvard project "represents the polar opposite", as it could
create the impression that continuing use of fossil fuels is possible.

Lili Fuhr, head of the international environmental policy division at the
Heinrich Böll Foundation in Germany, also said the plan was "crossing an
important political red line."

"They don't want to stop at this small experiment. The reason is to get
bigger experiments," she said.

She and Hällström said the plan would violate a global 2010 moratorium on
geoengineering under the U.N. Convention on Biodiversity.

That non-binding moratorium, however, allows exemptions for small-scale
scientific research studies.

Officials of the Harvard project, the Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation
Experiment (SCoPEx), said they did not believe it needed any special
approval from Sweden for the flight.

SCoPEx said about 300 similar stratospheric balloons were launched
worldwide in 2019. Backers of SCoPEx include Microsoft founder Bill Gates.

Anni Bolenius, spokeswoman for the Swedish Space Corporation, also said "We
comply with all applicable international and national legislations."

Janos Pasztor, executive director of the Carnegie Climate Governance
Initiative, praised the openness of the Harvard step-by-step approach.

"Let's not exaggerate and over-react on the critical negative side," he
urged, saying the Swedish test could help society debate and understand the
urgency of addressing climate change.

The Carnegie project says it is impartial about the potential use of
climate-altering technologies but wants to ensure robust governance.

Proponents of solar geoengineering, also known as solar radiation
modification, say deployment of the technology could be a shortcut to slow
a rise in global temperatures that is stoking more heatwaves, wildfires,
droughts and rising sea levels as billions of tonnes of greenhouse gases
build up in the atmosphere.

But opponents fear that it could undermine commitments to act under the
2015 Paris climate agreement and could have unwanted side-effects.

It would also, for instance, do nothing to slow a build-up of carbon
dioxide in the atmosphere that is turning the world's oceans increasingly
acidic.

Keith said that it made sense to study solar geoengineering.

"There is a long history of people doing research on things that were
socially unpopular at the time that we now see as important," he said, such
as birth control.

Read more:

Proposal for U.N. to study climate-cooling technologies rejected

Governments seek U.N. scrutiny of technologies to cool the climate

As climate risks rise, scientists call for rules on solar geoengineering

(Reporting by Alister Doyle ; editing by Laurie Goering : (Please credit
the Thomson Reuters Foundation, the charitable arm of Thomson Reuters.
Visit http://news.trust.org/climate)

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-07VyFD-hE%3D%3DBpBz%2B%3DTCdD9_zs_5XykzzyFb-Wg1ZkPLeg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to