---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: david emerson <[email protected]>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2021, 21:49
Subject: [CDR] Geoengineering Course
To: Carbon Dioxide Removal <[email protected]>


Hi All,

I’m not a regular contributor to this group, but thought I would share some
reflections on a course I  recently finished teaching on Geoengineering to
undergraduates (freshmen/sophomores) at Colby College. I am a
microbiologist interested in ocean fertilization, and taught the course
with my Bigelow Laboratory  colleague, Ben Twining (an Oceanographer). This
was a 4 week intensive course, in person. It was a small class, but
students were very engaged with a combination of lecture and class
presentations. We were able to bring in, via Zoom, both local (within
Maine) experts, as well as national experts, in different aspects of
Geoengineering, including Wil Burns. With such a diverse subject area,
these guests really added a lot to the class. Interestingly, we began the
class asking what’s in the name, Geoengineering, and ended the class asking
what we should call future classes. We went back and forth with Climate
Intervention and Climate Management, as well as Geoengineering, but
couldn’t come up with a definitive recommendation.

I came into the class with knowledge of iron fertilization, but only
general familiarity with other CDR methods. Needless to say, both Ben and I
learned a lot. The primary lesson this course brought home to me was that
there’s not going to any panacea regarding NET’s or SRM -- no penicillin
just waiting to be accidentally discovered. It’s going to be hard work
involving natural scientists, social scientists, engineers, business and
marketing sectors combined with political will. Once there’s enough
acceptance that maintenance of the Earth System itself has value, I expect
human ingenuity will find a way to curb the excesses of the Anthropocene.
The encouraging thing about teaching a course like this is that the youth
are getting message, and that’s going to make a big difference. I highly
recommend getting involved in teaching about Geoengineering (or whatever
you wish to call it) if you get the chance.

I’ve attached our syllabus in case anyone is interested, and a fun class
exercise we did in attempting to assign costs to different Geo-engineering
approaches. We spent over an hour on this, and got a third way through,
lots to debate.

Best, David


-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Carbon Dioxide Removal" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/644aa7f0-098c-4c1e-9eb9-baba9ad887f0n%40googlegroups.com
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/CarbonDioxideRemoval/644aa7f0-098c-4c1e-9eb9-baba9ad887f0n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-04KHoFqYb4cF-zMDZerRXtiXc7VKb8GaWV9WonS1O%3D1EA%40mail.gmail.com.

Attachment: NET_SRM value estimator.xlsx
Description: MS-Excel 2007 spreadsheet

Attachment: Geoengineering JanPlan syllabus.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Reply via email to