https://blogs.sciencemag.org/books/2021/03/15/under-a-white-sky/

Under a White Sky: The Nature of the Future
Elizabeth Kolbert
Crown
2021
256 pp.
Purchase this item now
Elizabeth Kolbert’s beautifully written new book Under a White Sky reports
from the planetary front lines where modern civilization is colliding with
nature and where thoughtful people are working hard to soften the impact.
“At this point it might be prudent to scale back our commitments and reduce
our impacts,” she writes. “But there are so many of us—as of this writing
nearly eight billion—and we are stepped in so far, return seems
impracticable.” If we are unable to retreat and cannot remain where we are,
how do we advance? Kolbert is a top journalist, but she is no pundit, and
she offers no easy answers.

The book begins with a visit to the canals of Chicago. The Mississippi
River basin and the Great Lakes basin were two distinct and biologically
separate drainage basins until a little more than a century ago, Kolbert
reveals, but early in the 20th century, canals were built, connecting Lake
Michigan to a tributary of the Mississippi River.

For most of the past century, the canal was too polluted to allow much
biological transfer, but with the passage of the Clean Water Act, it has
become passable by fish in recent decades, resulting in a bidirectional
invasion of species into previously distinct habitats. To mitigate this
problem, engineers have deployed devices in the canal to create an electric
field that shocks species attempting to cross between the two waterways. A
“bubble barrier” that uses water bubbles and sound as a deterrent, with an
estimated cost of $775 million, is also in the works.

>From the canals of Chicago, Kolbert takes readers south to New Orleans and
the Mississippi River delta. Once a freely meandering river, seasonally
flooding and dropping sediment, the Mississippi was gradually tamed and its
free flows channeled. Deprived of sediment and undermined by oil and gas
drilling, coastal land now sinks into the sea. “Every hour and a half,
Louisiana sheds another football field’s worth of land,” Kolbert writes.

With much of New Orleans below sea level already, society is faced with a
stark choice: to retreat or to mount a heroic (but ultimately futile)
defense. Short-term interests all but remove the first option from
consideration.

Moving westward, we learn that lakes and streams once snaked through the
U.S. desert. Over time, as the climate dried up, many of the region’s
waterways became disconnected, leaving tiny fish isolated and evolving into
species not found anywhere else. As ranches drill for irrigating water, and
the water tables fall, caves are drying up, likely causing the extinction
of some of these evolutionary anomalies. Kolbert describes the
extraordinary effort being mounted to head off the extinction of one such
creature, the Devils Hole pupfish, which includes a $4.5 million facsimile
of the species’ isolated cave.

In Hawaii, Kolbert speaks with scientists trying to genetically engineer
coral to survive in a hotter world. In Australia, she speaks with
scientists studying genetic methods to control poisonous cane toads. Like
the book’s other examples, both of these efforts are a response to a
problem of our own making. Ocean temperatures are rising because of
humanity’s addiction to fossil fuels. Cane toads are destroying Australian
ecosystems because we introduced them to control insects on agricultural
lands.

In the last part of the book, Kolbert shifts to the global climate, with
reporting on researchers who are working to remove carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere and on scientists who hypothesize that shooting reflective
particles into the stratosphere may be key to cooling Earth. This latter
solution, she notes, “has been described as ‘dangerous beyond belief,’ ‘a
broad highway to hell,’ ‘unimaginably drastic,’ and also as ‘inevitable.’”

Science and technology have brought us this far, but they have also
contributed to the current mess in which we find ourselves, so it is only
sensible to be skeptical of our ability to engineer ourselves out of this
predicament. Most of the researchers with whom Kolbert spoke shared this
perspective. Their efforts, rather than being evidence of unmitigated
techno-optimism, were “the best [solutions] that anyone could come up with,
given the circumstances.” Nevertheless, one senses that if we do get out of
this mess, it will be because of the efforts of scientists and
technologists who are searching for solutions during a time when humanity
seems an implacable force and nature an immovable object.

About the author

The reviewer is at the Department of Global Ecology, Carnegie Institution
for Science, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-06v0yPg9RZYV30Dc0fHgTnP93aiUGmL5b5EpVOrroyneQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to