Renauld’s reference is very relevant to this discussion. It is worth looking at 
the actual published material at http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s43247-021-00242-3   
The communication shows that there is a high heat flux below this region’s 
glaciers and in particular the Thwaites and Popes Glaciers which act as a cork 
for much of the Marie Byrd Ice sheet which covers the super volcano.  This is 
not good news as the data indicates that this region is particularly 
susceptible to effects of loss of ice mass due to the thin earth crust below 
the glaciers. 

 

Basically the feedback loop that I have laid out is supported by this data and 
could come to pass. Does anyone know if any of the climate modelling includes 
any of this? Are we flying blind into a possible situation where all our models 
and predictions are wildly off? At the very least there needs to be some 
modelling of this and estimates of risk of it happening so some sensible 
decision making can be made. Ultimately if it is agreed that the risks are what 
I have outlined, there needs to be public discussion around this and what can 
be done to prevent this (emission cuts and geo-engineering if we are at or 
close to a dangerous tipping point (which I fear may already the case)).

 

Dave 

 

From: Renaud de RICHTER <[email protected]> 
Sent: 19 August 2021 07:28
To: Andrew Lockley <[email protected]>
Cc: David Sevier <[email protected]>; HASZELDINE Stuart 
<[email protected]>; geoengineering <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [geo] New threat from Climate change and the use of Geo-engineering

 

https://phys.org/news/2021-08-thwaites-glacier-significant-geothermal-beneath.html
 

 

 

Le mer. 18 août 2021 12:47, Andrew Lockley <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > a écrit :

 

https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13583-melting-ice-caps-may-trigger-more-volcanic-eruptions/

 

 

Menu 

Melting ice caps may trigger more volcanic eruptions

EARTH 3 April 2008

By Catherine Brahic

 

New Scientist Default Image

Vatnajökull in the south-east is the largest ice cap in Iceland and conceals 
several volcanoes

 

(Image: NASA)

 

A warmer world could be a more explosive one. Global warming is having a much 
more profound effect than just melting ice caps – it is melting magma too.

 

Vatnajökull is the largest ice cap in Iceland, and is disappearing at a rate of 
5 cubic kilometres per year.

 

Carolina Pagli of the University of Leeds, UK, and Freysteinn Sigmundsson of 
the University of Iceland have calculated the effects of the melting on the 
crust and magma underneath.

 

 

They say that, as the ice disappears, it relieves the pressure exerted on the 
rocks deep under the ice sheet, increasing the rate at which it melts into 
magma. An average of 1.4 cubic kilometres has been produced every century since 
1890, a 10% increase on the background rate.

 

ADVERTISING

 

Frequent eruptions

In Iceland there are several active volcanoes under the ice. The last big 
eruption was in 1996 at Gjàlp, and before then in 1938 – a gap of 58 years. But 
Pagli and Sigmundsson say that the extra magma produced as the ice cap melts 
could supply enough magma for similar eruptions to take place every 30 years on 
average.

 

Predicting the eruptions precisely will be tricky, though, as the rate of magma 
migration to the surface is unknown.

 

 

The situation in Iceland does not necessarily mean magma will be melting faster 
around the world. Vatnajökull sits atop a boundary between plates in the 
Earth’s crust, and it is this configuration that is allowing the release in 
pressure to have such a great effect deep in the mantle.

 

But the thinning ice has another effect on volcanoes which will be more 
widespread.

 

As the amount of weight on the crust changes, geological stresses inside the 
crust will also change, increasing the likelihood of eruptions. “Under the 
ice’s weight, the crust bends and as you melt the ice the crust will bounce up 
again,” explains Bill McGuire of University College London in the UK, who was 
not involved in the study.

 

Unexpected activity

Pagli say places likely to be at increased risk of eruption due to ice-melt 
include Antarctica’s Mount Erebus, the Aleutian Islands and other Alaskan 
volcanoes.

 

The shifting stress might even cause eruptions in unexpected places.

 

“We think that during the Gjàlp eruption, magma reached the surface at an 
unusual location, mid-way between two volcanoes, because of these stress 
changes,” says Pagli.

 

McGuire thinks the Vatnajökull study is based on “perfectly reasonable” 
physics. However, he says that climate change presents an even more explosive 
threat. “It’s not just unloading the crust that triggers volcanic activity but 
loading as well.”

 

He and his team are looking into the effects that rising sea-levels – also a 
consequence of melting ice caps – will have on volcanoes. “We are going to see 
a massive increase in volcanic activity globally,” he told New Scientist. “If 
we look back at previous warm periods, that is what happened.”

 

Journal reference: Geophysical Research Letters (in press)

 

On Tue, 17 Aug 2021, 12:43 , <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

Stuart,

 

I read the paper that you kindly sent as a reference. I can see some issues 
that are relevant to compare Iceland ice loss to loss of ice in Marie Byrd land 
above the super volcano:

 

1.      The ice sheet thickness in Iceland is an average of 400 metres and a 
maximum thickness. The Western Antarctica  ice sheet above the super volcano is 
5 or 6 times this thickness. The response could be greater as a result?
2.      The super volcano currently is active as it provides heat that is 
responsible for half the ice flow from this glacier. I am unsure exactly how to 
line up this level of activity with potential magma levels that would mean that 
it is “primed” for eruption if the ice is removed.
3.      The last time that Western Antarctica was ice free was 35 million years 
ago. I don’t know where we could look to for a similar situation where this 
thickness of ice is removed from on top of a super volcano. While I am sure 
this has happened before, I am unaware of this happening in the near geological 
time period which will likely mean that getting detailed predictions of what 
might happen over dozens/centuries of time from what has previously occurred 
may not be possible.

 

A significant concern is that we are placing a lot of hopes for the future on 
the current climate models. If what I fear does happen, then we are going to 
enter completely unknown and potentially quite dangerous territory. If there is 
delay in the volcanic activity uptick after the loss of ice we may also only 
discover the folly of what has occurred when it is far too late.

 

Undertaking an experiment of this danger is very foolish. At the very least we 
should investigate this further, quantify the danger, and revisit our climate 
models and explore the impact of this occurring. Flying blind into a future 
without understanding this is madness. 

 

 

David Sevier

 

Carbon Cycle Limited

248 Sutton Common Road

Sutton, Surrey SM3 9PW

England

 

Tel 44 (0) 208 288 0128

 

 

 

 

From:  <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected] 
< <mailto:[email protected]> [email protected]> On 
Behalf Of Stuart Haszeldine
Sent: 17 August 2021 02:40
To: David Sevier < <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]>
Cc: geoengineering < <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [geo] New threat from Climate change and the use of Geo-engineering

 

Hello David, I can certainly relate to your line of arguement. I guess that the 
hazard depends on the unloading by ice melt being sufficient in pressure change 
to trigger eruptions - initially from magma at critical balance near-surface.   

 

Heres two thoughts, and then a piece of information. 

1) your reasoning will apply to any past rapid warming, to unload ice sheets. 
Haas anybody looked for changes in volcanism frequency or size during past 
glacial cycles, or coming out of glacial periods into warmer millennia.

 

2) If a super-volcano erupts, then its probably goodbye - but humans and most 
species did survive Mt Taupo about 22kyr ago.  I think magma reservoirs need 
about 50% liquid for a large scale eruption - so if there has been geophysics 
across the Antarctic that may be able to inform us if its ready to trigger or 
not.

 

3)  As additional information, the Quaternary record of tephra from Iceland has 
been investigated during the ast couple of decades to test a similar theory 
that unroofing ice load from volcanoes with shallow depth magma can trigger 
eruptions.  2km ice melt is 20 MPascal pressure change - so a big change on 
magma at 2km (50 MPa).   Less significant at 8km depth of magma chamber for 
Yellowstone or Taupo super volcanoes where the pressure is 200MPa, though a 10% 
change within hundreds of years ice melting is still a good trigger. 

 

This is C.L. Cooper and G.T Swindles Quaternary Sciences Advances  

May 2020.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qsa.2020.100004   And the correlation 
(attached) does appear to have some linkage by eye - though I’m sure that time 
series analysts in this group can do a better statistical job than that.

 

 

 

Stuart

Stuart Haszeldine  OBE FRSE C.Geol

Professor of Carbon Capture and Storage

School of GeoSciences
University of Edinburgh
Scotland UK, EH9 3FE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On 16 Aug 2021, at 17:35, <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > <[email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> > wrote:

 

This email was sent to you by someone outside the University. 

You should only click on links or attachments if you are certain that the email 
is genuine and the content is safe.

I believe that I have identified a new feedback loop/threat that emerges from 
the current trends of climate change. This new threat is likely to eclipse the 
already identified impacts of climate change and changes the moral calculation 
about whether to use geoengineering to cool the planet. It becomes immoral to 
fail to use geo-engineering to prevent this dangerous feedback loop from 
occurring.

We are in the process of increasing vulcanism of approximately 100 volcanoes 
and a super volcano as large as Yellowstone in the Southwestern Antarctica.  
The eruption of a large super volcano will potentially release greater than 
10,000 cubic kilometres of lava and ash (for perspective, Mt St Helen’s 
eruption was about 1 cubic kilometre). To make matters worse, the glaciers of 
this region are inherently unstable because they are grounded below sea level – 
meaning they can rapidly collapse. Approximately half the flow of ice to the 
sea from the ice sheet above Marie Byrd land is estimated to be the result of 
the melt water created by the heat of the super volcano below the ice. The 
Marie Byrd Land ice sheet is largely held back by the Thwaites ice sheet which 
is sometimes call the disaster glacier because it is considered to be unstable 
and could collapse relatively rapidly and raise world sea levels by 0.6 metres.

The Thwaites and Marie Byrd Land Ice sheets are up to three kilometres thick. 
They have lost between 60 to 100 metres of ice thickness as a result of climate 
change already.  Data from the melting of Iceland’s glaciers indicates that 
roughly speaking, the land rises approximately 1 metre for every 1 metre of ice 
that is melted over time. Therefore, when the weight of the ice sheet is 
removed from the underlying super volcano, the land could rise by kilometres 
over time. It would be a reasonable expectation that such a large land movement 
risk awaking the super volcano and the large number of volcanoes beneath 
Southwestern Antarctica.

The feedback loop of concern is as follows:

1.      The weight of the ice sheet above the super volcano and 100 other 
volcanoes reduces. This causes the land below to rise and increases the 
volcanic activity.
2.      The increased volcanic activity increases the release of heat from the 
super volcano and other volcanoes which then increases the volume of meltwater 
below the ice sheet.
3.      Increased melt water lubricates the flow of the ice sheets resulting in 
increased flow of ice out of the ice sheets leading to further loss of mass 
from the ice sheet which then further increases volcanic heat flux.
4.      This occurs until the ice sheets in Marie Byrd land and Southwestern 
Antarctica transition to rapid collapse from the below sea level portion of the 
ice sheet. Melting these ice sheets will raise sea levels and threaten coastal 
cities across the world.
5.      Collapse of the ice sheet removes the kilometres of ice weight from on 
top of the super volcano and the other volcanoes. Potentially the land will 
rise kilometres to seek equilibrium from the loss of the ice weight. Vulcanism 
increases significantly as a result.
6.      The rising of the land fully awakens the super volcano, and a long 
period of potentially very disruptive volcanism results.

It is worth noting that there has not been a large super volcano eruption since 
before our species evolved into being and could potentially be a significant 
threat to our civilization/survival. The rapid collapse of the ice sheets 
outlined would flood most of the world’s major cities. If it occurred within a 
short period of time such as a few decades, it would have severe economic and 
social disruption. A super volcano reawaken by the loss ice kilometres thick 
would likely be active for an extended period of time while the land was out of 
pressure equilibrium. From a human perspective of time, the awakening of a 
super volcano risks creating near permanent changes to the Earth’s climate. A 
super volcanic eruption could not be stopped once started.

I am unaware of any climate models that take the described feedback loop into 
account. I fear the impacts described will result in very different outcomes 
from the current models. 

The use of geo-engineering to prevent what I have outlined from occurring is 
moral. To not act to prevent this is immoral. Once the feedback loop passes a 
certain tipping point, it will be impossible to stop. The risk of this 
occurring eclipses the risk that there will be a delay in ending the burning of 
fossil fuels. Geo-engineering should NOT wait until the end of the decade to 
undertake trials. To do so risks passing dangerous tipping points. It should be 
used at scale as soon as practicable and prevent this deeply worrying feedback 
loop from happening. I strongly believe that when presented with this new 
threat and the use of geo-engineering to try to prevent this threat from 
occurring, the public will strongly back the use of geo-engineering. I also 
believe that it will focus the minds of politicians to finally act to cut 
carbon emissions.

 

David Sevier

 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to <mailto:[email protected]> 
[email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit  
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/022301d792bc%24c1b8a710%244529f530%24%40carbon-cycle.co.uk?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/022301d792bc%24c1b8a710%244529f530%24%40carbon-cycle.co.uk.

<Antarctic-BEDMAP2-topography-Fretwell-et-al-2013-rebounded-after-the-removal-of.png><Antarctic-ice-thickness-change-between-1992-and-2017.jpg><Schematic-map-of-separate-volcanoes-and-volcanic-provinces-in-Western-Antarctica-position.png><Trends
 in Antarctic Ice Sheet Elevation and Mass.pdf><marie-byrd position.jpg>

 

The University of Edinburgh is a charitable body, registered in Scotland, with 
registration number SC005336. Is e buidheann carthannais a th’ ann an Oilthigh 
Dhùn Èideann, clàraichte an Alba, àireamh clàraidh SC005336. 

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/B6C94D44-E5DD-414A-A203-A99E2CB62E5C%40ed.ac.uk
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/B6C94D44-E5DD-414A-A203-A99E2CB62E5C%40ed.ac.uk?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/00f401d7935d%240d3d4600%2427b7d200%24%40carbon-cycle.co.uk
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/00f401d7935d%240d3d4600%2427b7d200%24%40carbon-cycle.co.uk?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected] 
<mailto:[email protected]> .
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-04m-Ta%3D2rV3Pu-r%3DP3XSYo2OotEL6G0SgKTqhQdBQQdqw%40mail.gmail.com
 
<https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-04m-Ta%3D2rV3Pu-r%3DP3XSYo2OotEL6G0SgKTqhQdBQQdqw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
 .

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/012501d79516%2451c122f0%24f54368d0%24%40carbon-cycle.co.uk.

Reply via email to