https://acp.copernicus.org/preprints/acp-2021-813/

A novel approach to sulfate geoengineering with surface emissions of
carbonyl sulfide
Ilaria Quaglia, Daniele Visioni, Giovanni Pitari, and Ben Kravitz

Abstract.
Sulfate geoengineering (SG) methods based on lower stratospheric tropical
injection of sulfur dioxide (SO2) have been widely discussed in recent
years, focusing on the direct and indirect effects they would have on the
climate system. Here a potential alternative method is discussed, where
sulfur emissions are located at the surface in the form of carbonyl sulfide
(COS) gas. A time-dependent chemistry-climate model experiment is designed
from year 2021 to 2055, assuming a 40 Tg-S/yr artificial global flux of
COS, geographically distributed following the present day anthropogenic COS
surface emissions. The budget of COS and sulfur species is discussed, as
well as the effects of SG-COS on the stratospheric sulfate aerosol optical
depth (*Δ τ* = 0.080 in years 2046–2055), aerosol effective radius (0.46
*μm*), surface SO*x* deposition (+8.7 %) and tropopause radiative forcing
(RF) (−2.0 W/m2 for clear sky conditions and −1.5 W/m2 including the cloud
adjustment). Indirect effects on ozone, methane and stratospheric water
vapor are also considered, along with the COS direct contribution (with an
overall gas phase global radiative forcing of +0.23 W/m2). According to our
model results, the resulting net RF of this SG-COS experiment is −1.3 W/m2 for
the year 2050, and it is comparable to the corresponding RF of −1.7
W/m2 obtained
with a sustained injection of 4 Tg-S/yr in the tropical lower stratosphere
in the form of SO2 (SG-SO2, able to produce a comparable increase of the
sulfate aerosol optical depth). Significant changes of the stratospheric
ozone response are found in SG-COS with respect to SG-SO2 (+4.9 DU versus
+1.5 DU, globally). According to the model results, the resulting UVB
perturbation at the surface accounts to −4.3 % as a global-annual average
(versus −2.4 % in the SG-SO2 case), with a springtime Antarctic decrease of
−2.7 % (versus a +5.8 % increase in the SG-SO2 experiment). Overall, we
find that an increase in COS surface emission may be feasible, and produce
a more latitudinally-uniform forcing without the need for the deployment of
stratospheric aircrafts.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to geoengineering+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAKSzgpYQwKyspJKy25%3DPVqParaO%3DhWBtSF_9203J00PW%2BKJRSA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to