Dang! And it sounded so appealing!

Sent from my iPhone

> On Jun 25, 2022, at 3:22 PM, Alan Robock ☮ <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> But it's nasty stuff.  Please keep in mind the last sentence of the abstract, 
> "However, our assumption that the rate of COS uptake by soils and plants does 
> not vary with increasing COS concentrations will need to be investigated in 
> future work, and more studies are needed on the prolonged exposure effects to 
> higher COS values in humans and ecosystems."
> 
> From the National Library of Medicine, 
> https://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/compound/Carbonyl-sulfide :
> 
> "Carbonyl sulfide is a colorless, poisonous, flammable gas with a distinct 
> sulfide odor. The gas is toxic and narcotic in low concentrations and 
> presents a moderate fire hazard."
> 
> Alan
> 
> Alan Robock, Distinguished Professor
> Department of Environmental Sciences      Phone: +1-848-932-5751
> Rutgers University             E-mail: [email protected]
> 14 College Farm Road     http://people.envsci.rutgers.edu/robock
> New Brunswick, NJ 08901-8551    ☮ https://twitter.com/AlanRobock
>> On 6/25/22 2:25 PM, Ron Baiman wrote:
>> Dear Colleagues,
>> 
>> FYI, if you haven't heard or seen this.  
>> 
>> Carbonyl Sulfide (COS) aerosols released from the earth's surface and in 
>> models appear to have a cooling impact similar to SO2 released in the 
>> stratosphere. More research on the potential impacts of increased COS 
>> released from the surface into the troposphere, that (as I recall from the 
>> podcast) rises and stays in the stratosphere for an extended period of time, 
>> for example on soil and plant uptake is needed, but as Andrew opines, this 
>> method may be an "Sulfate Geoengineering COS Surface Radiative Forcing"  
>> (SG-COS-SRF) surface aerosol release breakthrough as it requires no aviation 
>> (conventional or other) or advanced injection technology. 
>> 
>> Listen here:
>> https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/using-tropospheric-cos-emissions-for-srm-quaglia/id1529459393?i=1000565776236
>> 
>> Paper Abstract:
>> An approach to sulfate geoengineering with
>> surface emissions of carbonyl sulfide
>> Ilaria Quaglia1, Daniele Visioni2, Giovanni Pitari1, and Ben Kravitz3,4
>> 1Department of Physical and Chemical Sciences, Università dell’Aquila, 67100 
>> L’Aquila, Italy
>> 2Sibley School for Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, 
>> Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
>> 3Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science, Indiana University, 
>> Bloomington, IN, USA
>> 4Atmospheric Sciences and Global Change Division, Pacific Northwest National 
>> Laboratory,
>> Richland, WA, USA
>> Correspondence: Ilaria Quaglia ([email protected])
>> Received: 29 September 2021 – Discussion started: 11 October 2021
>> Revised: 16 March 2022 – Accepted: 28 March 2022 – Published: 3 May 2022
>> Abstract. Sulfate geoengineering (SG) methods based on lower stratospheric 
>> tropical injection of sulfur dioxide
>> (SO2) have been widely discussed in recent years, focusing on the direct and 
>> indirect effects they would have on
>> the climate system. Here a potential alternative method is discussed, where 
>> sulfur emissions are located at the
>> surface or in the troposphere in the form of carbonyl sulfide (COS) gas. 
>> There are two time-dependent chemistry–
>> climate model experiments designed from the years 2021 to 2055, assuming a 
>> 40 Tg−S yr−1 artificial global flux
>> of COS, which is geographically distributed following the present-day 
>> anthropogenic COS surface emissions
>> (SG-COS-SRF) or a 6 Tg − S yr−1 injection of COS in the tropical upper 
>> troposphere (SG-COS-TTL). The
>> budget of COS and sulfur species is discussed, as are the effects of both 
>> SG-COS strategies on the stratospheric
>> sulfate aerosol optical depth (∼ 1τ = 0.080 in the years 2046–2055), aerosol 
>> effective radius (0.46 μm), surface
>> SOx deposition (+8.9 % for SG-COS-SRF; +3.3 % for SG-COS-TTL), and 
>> tropopause radiative forcing (RF;
>> ∼ −1.5 W m−2 in all-sky conditions in both SG-COS experiments). Indirect 
>> effects on ozone, methane and
>> stratospheric water vapour are also considered, along with the COS direct 
>> contribution. According to our model
>> results, the resulting net RF is −1.3 W m−2, for SG-COS-SRF, and −1.5 W m−2, 
>> for SG-COS-TTL, and it is
>> comparable to the corresponding RF of −1.7 W m−2 obtained with a sustained 
>> injection of 4 Tg − S yr−1 in the
>> tropical lower stratosphere in the form of SO2 (SG-SO2, which is able to 
>> produce a comparable increase of the
>> sulfate aerosol optical depth). Significant changes in the stratospheric 
>> ozone response are found in both SG-COS
>> experiments with respect to SG-SO2 (∼ 5 DU versus +1.4 DU globally). 
>> According to the model results, the
>> resulting ultraviolet B (UVB) perturbation at the surface accounts for −4.3 
>> % as a global and annual average
>> (versus −2.4 % in the SG-SO2 case), with a springtime Antarctic decrease of 
>> −2.7 % (versus a +5.8 % increase
>> in the SG-SO2 experiment). Overall, we find that an increase in COS 
>> emissions may be feasible and produce a
>> more latitudinally uniform forcing without the need for the deployment of 
>> stratospheric aircraft. However, our
>> assumption that the rate of COS uptake by soils and plants does not vary 
>> with increasing COS concentrations
>> will need to be investigated in future work, and more studies are needed on 
>> the prolonged exposure effects to
>> higher COS values in humans and ecosystems.
>> 
>> Full paper:
>> https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/22/5757/2022/ 
>> 
>> Best, 
>> Ron
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "geoengineering" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAPhUB9DjU62gj9J5-wJZ4%3D%3Drku-8-_%2BQWPG%3D6NT5L3fDKB%2B%3Dow%40mail.gmail.com.
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/171f5981-a614-2170-0713-4a3fd17652a2%40envsci.rutgers.edu.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/FFF5E7D7-6CA0-4668-A831-6F896B5D1451%40stonybrook.edu.

Reply via email to