https://www.ceew.in/publications/solar-geoengineering-and-montreal-protocol

*Solar Geoengineering and the Montreal Protocol*

Shikha Bhasin, Bhuvan Ravindran, and Eleonora Moro

Overview

This study analyses the Montreal Protocol as a potential instrument and
forum for the global governance of solar radiation management (SRM)
research. It creates an analytical framework to examine the objectives,
institutional capacity, and jurisdiction of the Montreal Protocol to
determine the extent to which it can govern SRM research. The study also
puts forth the latest science on the potential impacts of SRM and studies
previous attempts at geoengineering governance under different
international fora. It recommends certain principles of governance and
international law that must underline any proposed framework. Further, it
introduces the possibility of an overarching global institution for the
complete governance of geoengineering.

Key Highlights

   - The Environmental Effects Assessment Panel (EEAP) terms SRM as a ‘new
   threat’ and singles out Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI) technology
   for its side effects on the ozone layer.
   - The cross-border nature of the potential impacts of SRM research,
   development, or deployment necessitates international governance, which
   institutionalises informed
   decision-making.
   - Proposals for outdoor SRM research are gaining momentum, and the time
   is ripe to institutionalise an appropriate governance framework to avoid
   going down the slippery
   slope of deployment.
   - The link that draws SRM research under the Montreal Protocol’s
   governance umbrella is its potential impact on the ozone layer.
   - Two technical panels under the Montreal Protocol have specifically
   undertaken the scientific analysis of only those geoengineering techniques
   that impact the ozone layer.
   - Prevention must be prioritised over cure as the science of causal
   attribution is especially complicated in the case of solar geoengineering
   techniques.
   - The overlapping applicability of different international conventions
   is a real possibility given the largely unascertained impacts of SRM.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAKSzgpZTBRYkdAcsx5%2BFL33zxXWH5spW%3D4VEhNEA0UC1K0a0Dw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to