If anyone has drafted comments it would be great to see them here.

A

On Thu, 8 Sept 2022, 23:53 Ron Baiman, <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
>
> *Request for Public Comments:*
>
>
> In the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2022, the White House Office of
> Science and Technology Policy <https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/legal/> (OSTP),
> in coordination with relevant Federal agencies, was directed by Congress to
> develop a five-year “scientific assessment of solar and other rapid climate
> interventions in the context of near-term climate risks and hazards. The
> report shall include:
>
>    1.
>
>    the definition of goals in relevant areas of scientific research;
>    2.
>
>    capabilities required to model, analyze, observe, and monitor
>    atmospheric composition;
>    3.
>
>    climate impacts and the Earth's radiation budget; and
>    4.
>
>    the coordination of Federal research and investments to deliver this
>    assessment to manage near-term climate risk and research in climate
>    intervention.
>
>
>
> OSTP recognizes the importance of this research topic. With the assistance
> of the U.S. Global Change Research Program, OSTP is offering a brief
> comment period to enable public input while also providing a timely
> response to Congress. The focus of this plan will be on research
> associated with climate intervention, and comments are being requested in
> that context only.
>
>
>
> Input should be narrative only (i.e., no figures, graphics, or
> attachments), should be limited to 1,000 words, should respond to the
> Congressional direction above, and should relate either to one of the four
> categories listed in legislative language or more generally to climate
> intervention research.  Input must be submitted by 11:59 PM ET on
> September 9, 2022.
>
>
>
> Posted, Aug 19, 2022
>
> Open Notice,
> https://www.globalchange.gov/content/request-input-five-year-climate-intervention-research-plan
>
> Individuals interested in submitting comment should visit
> contribute.globalchange.gov
>
> *HPAC Submission*
>
> Healthy Planet Action Coalition USGCRP RCI Comment
>
> The Healthy Planet Action Coalition is a diverse international group of
> scientists, engineers, technologists, and public policy experts active in
> relevant fields spanning all aspects of climate change.
>
> We are united by a determined and informed optimism that a threefold
> approach can prevent climate catastrophes and restore a more benevolent
> climate. We call this approach “The Climate Triad”.
>
> The Climate Triad of  Direct Climate Cooling (DCC), GHG Emissions
> Reductions, and Greenhouse Gas Removal (GHGR) works as a complementary
> system to stabilize and moderate the climate and ultimately restore a safe,
> healthy, and sustainable planet. Creating this system requires a
> collaborative, inclusive, and expedited research program with a priority
> focus on direct climate cooling. HPAC offers these recommendations for
> the development of such a program.
>
>
>
> (1) The definition of goals in relevant areas of scientific research
>
>
>
> The Healthy Planet Action Coalition calls on the White House to set direct
> climate cooling, greenhouse gas removal and emission reduction as co-equal
> priorities. An overall goal of keeping temperature rise below 1.5°C could
> be achieved by a primary focus in this decade on cooling technologies to
> increase planetary albedo, cut radiative forcing, and implement other
> methods for direct climate cooling. Urgent direct climate cooling is now
> necessary to reduce current and near term human and other species harm and
> risk from current and near term future levels of global warming. Due to
> this urgency, we ask that the proposed five year research and
> implementation plan, depending on the method, be accelerated to one or two
> years.
>
>
>
> The following is a menu of proposed climate cooling approaches that we
> suggest merit early consideration and responsible investigation with
> actions that can be monitored and reported on:
>
>    -
>
>    Buoyant Flakes
>    -
>
>    Cirrus cloud thinning
>    -
>
>    Fizz Tops (Fiztops)
>    -
>
>    Ice Shields to thicken polar ice
>    -
>
>    Iron salt aerosol (ISA)
>    -
>
>    Making building and paving material more reflective and planting trees
>    in urban areas.
>    -
>
>    Marine algal bloom stimulation
>    -
>
>    Marine cloud brightening
>    -
>
>    Mirrors for Earth's Energy Rebalancing (MEER)
>    -
>
>    Ocean thermal energy conversion
>
>
>    -
>
>    Restoring natural upwelling and kelp forest ecosystem services offshore
>    -
>
>    Restoring soil and vegetation
>    -
>
>    Seawater atomization (Seatomizers)
>    -
>
>    Stratospheric Aerosol Injection (SAI)
>    -
>
>    Surface Albedo Modification (SAM)
>
> Short summaries for most of these methods written or reviewed by climate
> cooling experts cited in the document are available here:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TowThwi6j6cX3iLGBRrj22D30cYhKa_9/edit
>
>
>
> Relevant scientific research on direct climate cooling methods and
> technologies  currently being conducted include marine cloud brightening,
> stratospheric aerosol injection, sea-ice freezing, ocean thermal energy
> conversion, ocean and glacier microspheres, terrestrial and atmospheric
> mirrors, cirrus cloud thinning, iron salt aerosols, and white reflective
> rooftops and streets.
>
> Refreezing the poles should be a global climate priority in support of
> national and international security, biodiversity protection, and reducing
> extreme weather and sea level rise.  US encouragement of COP27 in Cairo to
> set goals on albedo and biodiversity would sharpen research priorities.
>
>
>
> (2) Capabilities required to model, analyze, observe, and monitor
> atmospheric composition
>
>
>
> A direct climate cooling program will require major capabilities in
> atmospheric science, enabling scientific experts to provide direct advice
> to government and industry on priorities and findings. Modeling, analysis,
> observation and monitoring of the atmosphere must guide climate
> intervention priorities and programs. Research, testing and deployment
> strategies require high level scientific skills in universities, supported
> by public and private investment.
>
>
>
> A way to encourage investment in cooling expertise is to introduce direct
> climate cooling credits as a more immediate climate offset than carbon
> credits.  Coordination of atmospheric science with governance systems is
> essential to enforce ethical standards, ensure safety and consultation
> through transparent and accountable planning and delivery, and link with
> international diplomacy on programs such as refreezing the Arctic.
>
>
>
> (3) Climate impacts and the Earth's radiation budget
>
>
>
> A focus on cooling technology is the best way to mitigate climate impacts
> and improve the Earth’s radiation budget in the near term, alongside
> ongoing work on emission reduction and GHG removal as they take effect over
> the longer-term. The best overall measure of climate impacts is radiative
> forcing, the excess of incoming over outgoing radiation at the top of the
> atmosphere. Government and private funds should be applied to methods that
> most effectively cut radiative forcing.  Augmenting the current carbon
> credit system with a system of direct climate cooling credits  would better
> cost the temperature impact of emission reduction, greenhouse gas removal
> and direct cooling technology.
>
>
>
> (4)  Coordination of Federal research and investments to deliver this
> assessment to manage near-term climate risk and research in climate
> intervention.
>
>
>
> The USA should coordinate with other nations to develop a cooperative
> international program to refreeze the Arctic Ocean. Domestic US resources
> should be mobilized to support coordinated global and regional climate
> cooling. Arctic Amplification (with up to four times the temperature rise
> of the equator) and the role of Arctic sea-ice in regulating climate
> through the jet stream and ocean currents make the Arctic Circle the most
> serious planetary warming risk and cooling priority.   Substantial cooling
> of the Arctic must be complemented by similar cooling of the Antarctic to
> achieve a stable global climate benefit. Ongoing disruption of these
> planetary systems is a major climate security risk, whereas action to
> reverse the disruption has benefits for peacebuilding, biodiversity and
> mitigation of warming.  Climate security should be integrated with military
> security as part of national strategic priority setting and risk
> assessment.  Diplomacy through the Arctic Council and COP27 and other
> relevant international bodies should engage on the urgency of cooling the
> pole, laying a foundation  for the USA to work with other interested
> governments to test and deploy methods that will help reverse the current
> warming trend.  Coordinated research and investment can be promoted by the
> USA taking a strong stance at COP27 and in other relevant international
> forums in favor of assessing direct cooling technology and refreezing the
> Arctic Ocean.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAPhUB9AtiHkp7VHdDJBqBDG2DJAyOJ%2BJh5J%2BnmWQyY4TVoecpw%40mail.gmail.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAPhUB9AtiHkp7VHdDJBqBDG2DJAyOJ%2BJh5J%2BnmWQyY4TVoecpw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAJ3C-06qGM5Z5nz6JwT_BZcO6nZq16kNRqi5e6XcWEbLP37yNg%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to