Thanks for the clarficiation!
Such a weird difficult time right now. Sometiems it´s hard to keep track
of what is right and wrong.
Best,
Maiken
Am 31.10.2022 um 18:59 schrieb Daniele Visioni:
Dear Maiken,
I can’t but give you my personal opinion: the people who wrote in the
blog have constantly demanded that governments and public research
institutions not fund research into geoengineering at all.
That’s the whole goal of the website on which the article is hosted
(they also demand that the IPCC should self-censor itself on the
topic, and that researchers should lose their job over their research.
It’s in the letter hosted on the website and you can look it up). With
that in mind, the authors move to accuse researchers of shady goals
not because that’s what they say or state publicly or privately, but
because they take funding for their research from sources the two
authors see as having those goals in mind. You can see the trap for
yourself.
If you want to hear directly from the researchers, you can find a
couple of opinion pieces I have been involved in (many more can be
found around from different sets of researchers).
https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/559859-climate-engineering-research-is-essential-to-a-just-transition-and/
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209632100053X
Best,
Daniele
--
******
Dr. Maiken Winter
Bahnhofstr. 12
82399 Raisting
08807 9280544
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/9da9c4c8-4cff-46fd-bcbf-007f565ce9b3%40maikenwinter.de.
