Dear Colleagues,

A potential podcast of interest:


https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/local-cooling-sai-cdr-baiman/id1529459393?i=1000598002442



Some of the topics talked about in the podcast:

1)      US Climate policy,

2)       Radical or heterodox economics, Neoclassical or orthodox
economics, and the DICE model,

3)      The need for urgent direct climate cooling *to have any impact* on
reducing climate harm in the short-run (at least) the next few decades,

4)       Discussions of local versus global, high leverage versus low
leverage, with economic costs or benefits, direct climate cooling methods,

5)       Discussion of net-zero warming plateau even as ocean uptake of
carbon continues, to the disconnect between climate scientists and
activists like us who are “screaming hair on fire” that *only direct
climate cooling can reduce climate harm now* and the earlier “marching
orders” that politicians and general public received that *doing something
about climate means “checking the box” on emissions cuts or net-zero*,

6)      How the long-run GHG reduction and removal coupled with natural
regeneration is not going to happen (at least not expeditiously at scale)
without *massive transfers of funding and technology from rich to poor
countries* of well above $4 T per year,

7)      How this expeditious transfer will not occur without a *mandatory
global cap and trade regime like Kyoto that transferred $303 B in mandatory
CDM offset funding mostly to China*, compared to the *purely voluntary
Paris Accord GCF voluntary donation efforts that have raised only $ 18 B*,

8)      How the *EU that continued the Kyoto mandatory regime is only major
region in the world to actually reduce GHG emissions since 1990,*

9)      Why focusing on and debating SAI as a *single binary yes or no
choice* on climate cooling is ill informed and counterproductive to the
cause of urgently focusing on and prioritizing direct climate cooling now,

10)   As we work on GHG removal and natural regeneration so that we can
emerge from our current energy and material “hunter gatherer” industrial
civilization “Sinai” to the sustainable and potentially much more equitable
renewable energy and materials “farmer cultivator” industrial civilization
“promised land” in the long-run.


See the podcast reference links for more comprehensive coverage.



       Enjoy!

       Best,

       Ron

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAPhUB9DEZGMRLyWr7Tk%2BPeo86fQ5VQ1DHwfG_3c53QczSAshSQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to