If you ask people what geoengineering is, they will either include chemtrails, 
or recycling, depending on the context (there was research around it at some 
point in the past). 

>From the point of view of someone part, in different contexts, of groups 
>trying to get the message across that we should devote research funding on 
>both CDR and SRM, having a term that tries to encompass both is useful. 

The AGU draft statement on Climate Intervention (a term I personally warmed up 
to more than geoengineering, and that I use in public talks, even though I 
don’t object to it being used in many contexts, such as GeoMIP) reflected this 
struggle - some people told us that we should keep the two separate, but in 
many people’s view (and mine) the effort of joining the two was valuable when 
discussing a common (research) endeavor aimed at managing climate risk in a 
more comprehensive way that goes behind “we should reduce emissions, and only 
political will/capitalism is preventing us from doing it”and tries to think 
“what to do if we are at risk of passing dangerous risk thresholds for which 
zero emissions won’t be enough?” - even if the challenges are very different in 
many cases.

These discussions can be extremely interesting (I found Ken’s response here 
very enlightening and good, even if I disagree with it!) - I just wish some 
would tone-police other people way less over the terms they decide to use!


> On 13 Feb 2023, at 15:02, David desJardins <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I don't really understand why it's important to people to include CDR as a 
> form of geoengineering. What's behind this fight? I suspect that a majority 
> would not include it in that term. If we're going to have a fight about 
> "established nomenclature", I'd like to see some data.
>> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "geoengineering" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAP%3DxTqP4V7hsPWsc1UYZUt4%2BxHUyU8o0%2BmvqY2fZbjRq0Wxodw%40mail.gmail.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAP%3DxTqP4V7hsPWsc1UYZUt4%2BxHUyU8o0%2BmvqY2fZbjRq0Wxodw%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/84BDE4D4-44EF-4CA9-ABD8-6EB809DC2308%40gmail.com.

Reply via email to