https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221209632300013X
*Authors* Talbot M Andrews, Nicholas P. Simpson, Katharine J. Mach , Christopher H. Trisos *13 February 2023* Abstract Effectively responding to intensifying climate change hazards requires identifying risks arising from each response, as well as risks arising from the dynamic interactions between responses. *Using examples of managed retreat and solar geoengineering, we illustrate the importance of understanding response as a determinant of climate change risk. *We highlight a continuum of severity of response risks, both at the site of deployment and across temporally and geographically distant contexts. While responses might moderate a specific hazard, due to the complexity of climate change risk they may be ineffective at reducing net climate-related risk for any given actor or system. How responses to climate change affect vulnerability, exposure, and other responses to climate change independent of the targeted hazard and can lead to maladaptation. We conclude by emphasizing the importance of integrating climate change responses together with other determinants of risk to better inform climate risk management and guide research on the feasibility of individual response options. Keywords Climate change, Response risk, Managed retreat Solar geoengineering, Cascading risk, Compound risk, Climate risk management Figure 1. Integrating response as a dimension of climate change risk Figure 2. *Examples of how risks can emerge from climate change response*. *Source: ScienceDirect* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAOyeF5sg5Kd7G_tdgp1npWqfotsSuvqK7RF9bzNaBcnt9eJK5A%40mail.gmail.com.
