https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/14/39/2023/

*Authors*
Aobo Liu, John C. Moore <[email protected]>, and Yating Chen

*24 January 2023*

https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-14-39-2023

*Abstract*

Circum-Arctic permafrost stores large amounts of frozen carbon that must be
maintained to avoid catastrophic climate change. *Solar geoengineering has
the potential to cool the Arctic surface by increasing planetary albedo but
could also reduce tundra productivity. *Here, we improve the
data-constrained PInc-PanTher model of permafrost carbon storage by
including estimates of plant productivity and rhizosphere priming on soil
carbon. Six *earth system models are used to drive the model, running
G6solar (solar dimming) and G6sulfur (stratospheric sulfate aerosols)
experiments, which reduce radiative forcing from SSP5-8.5 (no mitigation)
to SSP2-4.5 (substantive mitigation) levels. *By 2100, simulations indicate
a loss of 9.2 ± 0.4 million km2 (mean ± standard error) of permafrost area
and 81 ± 8 Pg of soil carbon under the SSP5-8.5 scenario. In comparison,
under SSP2-4.5, G6solar, and G6sulfur, permafrost area loss would be
mitigated by approximately 39 %, 37 %, and 34 % and soil carbon loss by 42
%, 54 %, and 47 %, respectively, relative to SSP5-8.5. Uncertainties in
permafrost soil C loss estimates arise mainly from changes in vegetation
productivity. Increased carbon flux from vegetation to soil raises
soil C storage,
while the priming effects of root exudates lowers it, with a net mitigating
effect on soil C loss. Despite model differences, the protective effects of
G6solar and G6sulfur on permafrost area and soil C storage are consistent
and significant for all ESMs. G6 experiments mitigate ∼  of permafrost area
loss and halve carbon loss for SSP5-8.5, averting USD 0–70 trillion (mean
of USD 20 trillion) in economic losses through reduced permafrost emissions.

*Source: European Geosciences Union*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9_WjmUqNoV1ST_qDv_Y5167Bt5j%3DSoN47F3M4mbF8uJHA%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to