*https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01738-w
<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01738-w>*

*Authors*

   - J. Sutter
   <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01738-w#auth-J_-Sutter-Aff1-Aff2>
   ,
   - A. Jones
   <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01738-w#auth-A_-Jones-Aff3>,
   - T. L. Frölicher
   
<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01738-w#auth-T__L_-Fr_licher-Aff1-Aff2>
   ,
   - C. Wirths
   <https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01738-w#auth-C_-Wirths-Aff1-Aff2>
    &
   - T. F. Stocker
   
<https://www.nature.com/articles/s41558-023-01738-w#auth-T__F_-Stocker-Aff1-Aff2>

   -
   - *10 August 2023*
   -
   - *Citations*: Sutter, J., Jones, A., Frölicher, T.L. *et al.* Climate
   intervention on a high-emissions pathway could delay but not prevent West
   Antarctic Ice Sheet demise. *Nat. Clim. Chang.* (2023).
   https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-023-01738-w

Abstract

Solar radiation modification (SRM) is increasingly discussed as a tool to
reduce or avert global warming and concomitantly the risk of ice-sheet
collapse, as is considered possible for the West Antarctic Ice Sheet
(WAIS). Here we analyse the impact of stratospheric aerosol injections on
the centennial-to-millennial Antarctic sea-level contribution using an
ice-sheet model. We find that mid-twenty-first-century large-scale SRM
could delay but ultimately not prevent WAIS collapse in a high-emissions
scenario. On intermediate-emissions pathways, SRM could be an effective
tool to delay or even prevent an instability of WAIS if deployed by
mid-century. However, SRM interventions may be associated with substantial
risks, commitments and unintended side effects; therefore, emissions
reductions to prevent WAIS collapse seem to be the more practical and
sensible approach at the current stage.

*Source: nature*

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh98KK_obGdRmtXbNt633HSV8%3Dq%2BTNs6No9MLuyFd%2BDTrgQ%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to