*This item and others will be in the monthly “Solar Geoengineering Updates
Substack” newsletter:* https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/
-----------------------------------------------------------------

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022098124000030

*Authors*
Conor Hendrickson, Peter Butcherine, Alejandro Tagliafico, Sophia L. Ellis,
Daniel P. Harrison, Brendan P. Kelaher

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jembe.2024.151988

*29 January 2024*

*Highlights*
•Hydnophora exesa did not respond positively to increased abundance of
PUFAs.

•PUFA enrichment may not be appropriate for some coral species.

•Light was likely not a significant stress factor due to low irradiance
levels.

•Higher irradiance levels are needed to evaluate coral shading techniques.


*Abstract*
Mass coral bleaching driven by climate change impacts coral reefs globally.
As net zero emissions and a return to pre-industrial global temperatures
are unlikely to occur in the near future, there is an urgent need to
engineer intervention methods that can mitigate the risk of coral bleaching
at different scales. *Coral dietary enrichment and shade-based irradiance
reduction have each been shown to reduce coral bleaching*. Here, we tested
the hypothesis that combining these two intervention methods could further
reduce the risk and impact of bleaching using an outdoor experiment with
fragments of the coral Hydnophora exesa. The experiment was set up over
three orthogonal factors: shade (2 levels – 4 h of 30% shade and no shade),
temperature (2 levels – 32.6 °C and 26.4 °C) and food type (2 levels –
fatty-acid enriched and non-enriched Artemia). The provision of 30% shade
for 4 h did not significantly affect any of the measured bleaching response
variables, likely due to the low natural irradiance for all treatments
throughout the experiment. Significant bleaching of H. exesa fragments
occurred in the high-temperature treatments after 18 days of thermal
stress. Feeding the corals Artemia enriched with omega-3 and omega-6 fatty
acids had a minor impact on the proportion of fatty acids in the corals and
resulted in a decline in chlorophyll a content and symbiont density.
Overall, these results suggest that coral PUFA enrichment may have limited
potential as a mitigation tool to minimise the risk of mass coral bleaching
as numerous factors such as species and lipidome composition must be
considered. In addition, we recommend that irradiance values higher than
the natural light levels recorded during our experiment are required to
effectively test the ability of shading technologies designed to reduce
mass bleaching of coral reefs.

*Conclusions*
A lipid-enriched diet did not limit bleaching in H. exesa and may have had
a detrimental effect on the species due to the PUFA-heavy formulation of
the diet not being appropriate for the species, especially during thermal
stress, or due to coral lipidome interactions in the omega-3 and omega-6
biosynthesis chain. Currently, there is no practical method to deliver live
or formulated diets to corals at reef-level scale and such a deployment
could have a variety of impacts on other reef species. *In contrast,
shading at a reef-wide scale may be possible with marine cloud brightening
and fogging (Bay et al., 2019; Baker et al., 2021).* Although the provision
of 30% shade for 4 h daily did not significantly impact any of the measured
bleaching responses, the moderate ambient light levels in our experiment
were likely insufficient to influence bleaching in H. exesa. *Further
research is needed on coral shading using rigid structures, fogging, or
marine cloud brightening sprayer designs under light conditions more
representative of those that typically occur in shallow depths during
bleaching events (500–700 μmol m−2 s−1 peak)*. Our experiment highlights
several possibilities and challenges with proposed bleaching mitigation
tools. The long-term conservation of coral reefs will depend on both the
application of innovative conservation solutions at the reef level, as well
as a steadfast commitment to global emission reductions.

*Source: ScienceDirect *

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"geoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh98%2B9s2fwkCOTWv%2B3W6qHn5iDcM8YpmvSnoahf1VRz4%2Brw%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to