*This item and others will be in the monthly “Solar Geoengineering Updates Substack” newsletter:* https://solargeoengineeringupdates.substack.com/ ---------------------------------------------------------------
https://egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/2024/egusphere-2024-235/ *Authors* Lucas A. McMichael, Michael J. Schmidt, Robert Wood, Peter N. Blossey, and Lekha Patel *How to cite*. McMichael, L. A., Schmidt, M. J., Wood, R., Blossey, P. N., and Patel, L.: Exploring ship track spreading rates with a physics-informed Langevin particle parameterization, EGUsphere [preprint], https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-2024-235, 2024. Received: 29 Jan 2024 – *Discussion started: 23 Feb 2024* *Abstract*. The rate at which aerosols spread from a point source injection, such as from a ship or other stationary pollution source, is critical for accurately representing subgrid plume spreading in a climate model. Such climate model results will guide future decisions regarding the feasibility and application of large-scale intentional marine cloud brightening (MCB). Prior modeling studies have shown that the rate at which ship plumes spread may be strongly dependent on meteorological conditions, such as precipitating versus non-precipitating boundary layers and shear. In this study, we apply a Lagrangian particle model (PM-ABL v1.0), governed by a Langevin stochastic differential equation, to create a simplified framework for predicting the rate of spreading from a ship-injected aerosol plume in sheared, precipitating, and non-precipitating boundary layers. The velocity and position of each stochastic particle is predicted with the acceleration of each particle being driven by the turbulent kinetic energy, dissipation rate, momentum variance, and mean wind. These inputs to the stochastic particle-velocity equation are derived from high-fidelity large-eddy simulations (LES) equipped with a prognostic aerosol-cloud microphysics scheme (UWSAM) to simulate an aerosol injection from a ship into a cloud-topped marine boundary layer. The resulting spreading rate from the reduced-order stochastic model is then compared to the spreading rate in the LES. The stochastic particle-velocity representation is shown to reasonably reproduce spreading rates in sheared, precipitating, and non-precipitating cases using domain-averaged turbulent statistics from the LES. *Source: EGU Sphere* -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "geoengineering" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/geoengineering/CAHJsh9-X529bPOB7EXnSZ5M1nv0ki3ddtU1-RSPJGwsTaSmE3Q%40mail.gmail.com.
